C. HARI SHANKAR
Manju Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Vilas Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT
C.Hari Shankar, J. - By this petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act"), the petitioners seek reference of disputes that had arisen vis-a-vis the respondents, to arbitration, in accordance with Clause 3.15 of a Memorandum of Family Settlement (hereinafter referred to as "MFS"), dated 28 th April, 2007, executed among the petitioners and the respondents, being the members of one family.
2. A reading of the MSF reveals that disputes among the petitioners and the respondents, vis-a-vis certain corporate entities being managed by them, had arisen, resulting in CP 31/2007 being filed before the Company Law Board, Principal Bench. In order to settle their disputes and differences amicably, the petitioners and respondents executed the MFS, agreeing to be bound by the terms thereof. The purpose to the MFS was specifically stated, in Clause 1(i) thereof, as being "to reduce in writing the terms and conditions of settlement of disputes and differences as agreed by and between the parties to this MFS and furt
Boghara Polyfab Private Limited
BSNL vs. Telephone Cables Ltd.
Dresser Rand S.A. vs. Bindal Agro Chem Ltd.
Manish Mohan Sharma and Others vs. Ram Bahadur Thakur Ltd.and Others.
Nirmala J. Jhala vs. State of Gujarat
PSA Mumbai Investments Pte. Ltd. vs. Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust
Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. vs. Northern Coal Field Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.