D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, A. S. BOPANNA, J. B. PARDIWALA
Tata Power Company Limited Transmission – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI.
A glossary of defined terms used in the judgment has been provided below:
| Glossary of Terms | |
| Defined Term | Definition |
| Act | Electricity Act, 2003 |
| AEMIL/second respondent | Adani Electricity Mumbai Infra Limited |
| AEML-T third respondent | Adani Electricity Mumbai Limited - Transmission |
| APTEL | Appellate Tribunal for Electricity |
| CEA | Central Electricity Authority Development Guidelines Guidelines for encouraging Competition in Development of Transmission Projects |
| DPR | Detailed Progress Report |
| EC/fifth respondent | Empowered Committee |
| FoR | Forum of Regulators |
| GoM’s GR | Government of Maharashtra’s, Government Resolution dated 04.01.2019 |
| HVDC | High Voltage Direct Current |
| HVDC Project | 1000 MW HVDC (VSC based) link between 400 kV MSETCL Kudus & 220 kV AEML Aarey EHV Station |
| MERC/first respondent | Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission |
| MERC MYT Regulations | Maharashtra Electricity Regula |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.