SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI, K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Gagan Narang and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 7463-7464 of 2023
Decided On : 02-01-2025
JUDGMENT :
B.R. GAVAI, J.
1. The present appeals filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 20031 [‘the Act’ hereinafter] arise out of the Impugned common final judgment and order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity at New Delhi2 [‘APTEL’ hereinafter] dated 31st August 2023 passed in DFR No. 245 of 2023 and DFR No. 247 of 2023 which were both filed by the Respondent No. 1 herein-Mr. Gagan Narang. The APTEL disposed of the appeals and set aside the orders of the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission3 [‘DERC’ hereinafter] dated 6th and 7th March 2023. Vide the order dated 6th March 2023 the DERC had dismissed the petition filed by Waste to Energy Research & Technology Council4 [‘WTERT’ hereinafter] challenging the authority of the Appellant herein-Municipal Corporation of Delhi5 [‘Appellant-MCD’ hereinafter] to issue the tariff-based bid and Request for Proposal6 [‘RFP’ hereinafter] for setting up the Waste to Energy7 [‘WTE’ hereinafter] project at Narela Bawana, Delhi. Vide order of 7th March 2023, the DERC had approved the bid tariff of Rs. 7.38/- KWh for the project and had directed the Distribution Licensee to negotiate the terms of the Power Purchase Agreement8 [‘PPA’ hereinafter] with the Appellant-MCD.
2. Shorn of details, the facts leading to the present appeals are:
2.2 The Appellant-MCD, issued the Notice Inviting Tender9 [‘NIT’ hereinafter] and the RfP dated 15th July 2022 whereby the tariff-based bids for procurement of power under WTE project for Solid WTE Processing Facility with a minimum 28 MW capacity in Narela Bawana, New Delhi, for 3000 (+/- 20%) TPD of MSW10 [‘Project’ hereinafter] were invited. The documents for the same were sent to the DERC for its consideration.
2.3 The DERC, vide letter dated 24th August 2022 directed the Appellant-MCD to file a petition for approval of PPA, Rfp, etc. The letter also contained the details of the petitions filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation and the East Delhi Waste Processing Co. Ltd. seeking similar approvals, which were granted by the DERC through separate orders. An evaluation committee was also constituted for the evaluation of bids and other related issues. The Appellant-MCD issued a notice that the bidding process dated 15th July 2022 were closed and a new NIT was issued on 21st October 2022 with identical terms as the earlier NIT.
2.4 The WTERT filed a Petition No. 65 of 2022 before the DERC inter alia challenging the authority of the Appellant-MCD for issuing the tariff-based bid and the RfP in setting up the Project. During the pendency of this petition, the bidding process was undertaken, and on 14th November 2022, bids were received from M/s JITF Urban Infrastructure Ltd. and M/s JBM Renewables Pvt. Ltd. A meeting of the Evaluation committee was held, and the documents submitted by the bidders keeping in mind the requirement of the RfP document were discussed, and on recommendation of the committee, the bids of both the bidders were declared to be technically qualified and their bids were allowed to be opened. The Regional Centre for Urban & Environmental Studies11 [‘RCUES’ hereinafter] calculated the levelized tariff based on the RfP and the same was communicated and calculated as:
| Name of the Bidder | Levelized Tariff (Rs/KWh) |
Pune Municipal Corporation vs. Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch and Others
Energy Watchdog vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Others
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and Another vs. Emta Coal Limited
Jugalkishore Saraf vs. Raw Cotton Co. Ltd.
Ajit Mohan vs. Delhi Legislative Assembly
Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and Others vs. MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited and Others
Sanjay Ramdas Patil vs. Sanjay and Others
Balasinor Nagrik Coop. Bank Ltd. vs. Babubhai Shankerlal Pandya
Mohan Kumar Singhania v. Union of India
Sultana Begum v. Prem Chand Jain
The court clarified that Section 63 of the Electricity Act allows local authorities to apply for tariff adoption, rejecting the APTEL's restrictive interpretation.
Determination and regulation of tariff – Electricity Act 2003 provides States sufficient flexibility to regulate intra-state transmission systems, wherein Appropriate State Commissions possess power ....
Point of law: since Merit Order Despatch does not apply to renewable energy, which runs on Must Run Basis, the learned single Judge has not committed any illegality in directing that the respondents ....
(1) Court, while interpreting a particular provision, will have to apply principles of purposive construction – Modern approach of interpretation is a pragmatic one, and not pedantic.(2) Court should....
Tariff determination for hydro projects with enhanced capacity, binding nature of prior PPAs on successors, and writ jurisdiction limited; exclusive domain of regulatory commission, not courts, to fi....
(1) Determination of capital cost of project and rate of tariff at which power has to be purchased would always be subject to regulatory control of State Commission.(2) Every action of State is requi....
Writ petitions challenging regulatory fixation of normative O&M charges as tariff component not maintainable due to statutory appeal to expert Appellate Tribunal under Electricity Act, absent jurisdi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.