M. R. SHAH, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Land Acquisition Collector (South East) – Appellant
Versus
Dharamvir – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. Shah, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 25.04.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 4576 of 2015 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petition preferred by the respondents herein and has declared that the land acquisition proceedings with respect to the land in question is deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2013”), the Land Acquisition Collector (South East), Delhi Government has preferred the present appeal.
2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court it appears that though it was submitted before the High Court that the possession of the land in question was taken on 16.03.2004, however thereafter relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors., (2014) 3 SCC 183 and by observing that the compensation with respect to the land in question has not been paid, the High Court has allowed the said writ petition and ha
Lapse of land acquisition proceeding – In case a person has been tendered compensation as provided under Section 31(1) of 1894 Act, it is not open to him to claim that acquisition has lapsed under Se....
Lapse of land acquisition proceeding – Fact that possession of land in question was taken over on 14.07.1987, there shall not be any deemed lapse of acquisition.
Lapse of land acquisition proceeding – Fact that possession of land in question was taken over on 21.04.2006, there shall not be any deemed lapse of acquisition.
Possession of land and payment of compensation are crucial factors in determining whether there is a lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, ....
The interpretation of Section 24(2) requires both possession and compensation to be considered for deeming land acquisition proceedings as lapsed.
Lapse of land acquisition proceeding – Landowners who had refused to accept compensation or who sought reference for higher compensation, cannot claim that acquisition proceedings had lapsed under Se....
Lapse of land acquisition proceeding – Once possession of land in question was taken over on 12.03.1981 then acquisition of land in question is not deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of Right ....
Once possession is taken, there shall be no deemed lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013.
Land acquisition proceeding will not lapse where possession of land could not be taken by authority due to pending litigation/stay.
The interpretation and application of Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013 are crucial in determining whether there is a deemed lapse of land acquisition proceedings based on possession, compensation, and ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.