DINESH MAHESHWARI, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Istkar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Maheshwari, J.
Leave Granted.
2. Though a short question as regards forfeiture of the bond furnished by the appellant in terms of Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731[Hereinafter also referred to as ‘CrPC’ or ‘the Code’.] and the amount payable thereunder is involved in this matter but, having regard to its implications, we deem it appropriate to dilate on the relevant aspects in necessary details.
3. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 19.07.2022, as passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad2[Hereinafter also referred to as ‘the High Court’.] in a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India bearing No. 4882 of 2021. The appellant had preferred the said petition against the order dated 08.09.2021, as passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Muzaffarnagar3[Hereinafter also referred to as ‘the Revisional Court’.] in Criminal Revision No. 145 of 2021, whereby the Revisional Court had declined to interfere with the order dated 23.07.2021, as passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Budhana4[Hereinafter also referred to as ‘the Magistrate’.] in Case No. 2836 of 2021 in exercise of powers under Section 122
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.