VIRENDER SINGH
Bir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Appellant-Bir Singh has filed the present appeal, under Section 449 (ii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘CrPC’), against the order, dated 11th April, 2023, passed by the Court of learned Special Judge, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’) in Cr.MA No. 193 of 2023, titled as State of H.P. versus Bir Singh.
2. The order impugned herein has been passed in proceedings, under Section 446 CrPC, in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2021, titled as State of H.P. versus Melwin Benny Aarons. These proceedings were initiated in FIR No. 197 of 2020, registered at Police Station Aut, District Mandi, H.P.
3. According to the appellant, accused-Melwin Benny Aarons, in case FIR No. 197 of 2020, dated 21st January, 2020, moved the application, under Section 439 CrPC, which was allowed and thereafter, the appellants stood as surety for him. When, accused-Melwin Benny Aarons failed to appear before the learned trial Court, on 18th March, 2022, non-bailable warrants were issued by forfeiting his surety bond to the State of Himachal Pradesh. Thereafter, the proceedings were initiated under Section 446 CrPC.
4. Since, t
Narata Ram versus State of H.P.
Dhameswar Sahoo and Another vs. State of Orissa
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to adhere to the prescribed procedure under Section 446 CrPC for the forfeiture of surety bonds, including issuing show cause notic....
A surety must be afforded an opportunity to contest the imposition of a penalty for non-production of an accused, adhering to principles of natural justice.
The court reaffirmed that the forfeiture of a bond under Section 446 of the CrPC requires adherence to procedural safeguards, including notice and an opportunity for the accused to respond, to uphold....
Under Section 446(3) Cr.P.C., courts may discretionarily remit portion of penalty on forfeited surety bonds, factoring surety's sincere efforts, financial hardship and family impact, even in appeal t....
Court holds that the penalty for surety bond forfeiture must consider the surety's efforts and circumstances; excessive penalties can be modified at judicial discretion.
The court has discretion to remit penalties imposed on sureties under Section 446(3), considering the circumstances of the case and ensuring a fair outcome for the surety's financial status.
The court has discretion under Section 446 Cr.P.C to remit a portion of the penalty imposed on a surety, considering the financial situation of the surety and efforts to secure the accused's attendan....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.