SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 1137

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
N.V. RAMANA, CJI., SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI, JJ.
In Re: Violence in Lakhimpur Kheri (U.P.) Leading to Loss of Life – Appellant
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 426 of 2021
Decided On : 17-11-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Shiv Kumar Tripathi, C.S. Panda, Kamlesh Kumar Maurya, Shiv Kumar Vats, Goverdhan Dass Aggarwal.
For the Respondents: Arun Bhardwaj, Ronak Karanpuria, Rahul Kumar Sharma, A.P. Singh, V.P. Singh, Geeta Chauhan, Sadashiv, Harshvir Pratap Sharma, Astha Tyagi, Dinesh Chander Trehan, Vyom Chaturvedi, Harish Salve, Garima Prashad, Shantanu Singh, Akshay Chowdhary, Ruchira Goel.

The court's authority to ensure a fair and impartial investigation into alleged criminality, reconstitute the SIT, and appoint a retired High Court Judge to monitor the investigation to preserve the faith and trust of people in the Criminal Administration of the Justice System.

Headnote:

Sentinels of Justice - Public Interest Litigation - The court appointed a retired High Court Judge to monitor the ongoing investigation into a tragic incident during the farmers' protests, reconstituted the Special Investigation Team (SIT) with directly recruited IPS officers from outside the state, and directed the SIT to utilize latest forensic investigative methods to ensure transparency, fairness, and absolute impartiality in the outcome of the investigation.

Fact of the Case:

The case arose from an incident during the farmers' protests in which several protesters were killed and injured after being rammed and run over by vehicles. The court was approached through a PIL seeking an independent and federal inquiry into the incident.

Finding of the Court:

The court expressed concern about the fairness of the ongoing investigation and proposed the appointment of a former Judge of the High Court to monitor the investigation. The State Government agreed to the proposal, and the court reconstituted the SIT with directly recruited IPS officers from outside the state to ensure transparency and impartiality in the investigation.

Issues: Fairness of the ongoing investigation, reconstitution of the SIT, and appointment of a retired High Court Judge to monitor the investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's role as the 'sentinels of justice' to ensure the rule of law and Constitutional guarantees of a fair and impartial investigation into alleged criminality, as well as the need for justice to not only be done but also be seen and perceived to be done. The court's authority to reconstitute the SIT and appoint a retired High Court Judge to monitor the investigation to preserve the faith and trust of people in the Criminal Administration of the Justice System.

Final Decision: The court appointed Justice (Retd.) Rakesh Kumar Jain, a former Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, to monitor the ongoing investigation, reconstituted the SIT with directly recruited IPS officers from outside the state, and directed the SIT to utilize latest forensic investigative methods to ensure transparency, fairness, and absolute impartiality in the outcome of the investigation.

ORDER :

1. The Court is convened through hybrid mode.

2. The present PIL arises in the background of an incident which took place in Tikunia in the Lakhimpur Kheri District of Uttar Pradesh, during the farmers’ protests against the Indian Agricultural Acts of 2020. On October 3rd 2021, several protesters had been blocking the road to restrict passage for the UP Deputy Chief Minister who was on his way to Banbirpur village. While standing and/or walking on the road, these protesters were rammed from behind by a Mahindra Thar SUV and then run over by the same vehicle. Two other vehicles that were part of the same convoy also ran over those who had already been thrown to the ground and crushed by the first SUV. The incident resulted in 8 deaths and several suffered injuries. This Court was seized of the matter when two lawyers wrote to this Court seeking an independent and federal inquiry into the incident.

3. The matter is currently under investigation by the local police, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been formed, and some arrests have been made. Given the nascent stage of the investigation, we are consciously reluctant to make any observation on the merits of the case, as that would have an impact on the parties involved and influence the prosecuting agency and the courts which would ultimately look into the case.

4. During the course of hearing on 8.11.2021, 12.11.2021 and 15.11.2021, some of the parties questioned the fairness of the ongoing investigation. Hence we proposed to appoint a former Judge of the High Court to monitor the investigation and also to induct new Members in the SIT who may carry out the investigation, uninfluenced by any consideration. Shri Harish Salve, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh sought time to have instructions and thereafter on 15.11.2021, he very fairly stated that the State Government has no objection to the recourse suggested by this Court.

5. This Court is equally concerned about guaranteeing an impartial, fair, just and thorough investigation into the incident which has resulted in such a tragic loss of lives of protesters as well as some other persons.

6. Earlier hereto, we have expressed our disapproval on the slow pace, manner and outcome of the investigation conducted so far, as well as the composition of the SIT charged with investigating the matter.

7. This Court in Babubhai Jamnadas Patel vs. State of Gujarat and Others, (2009) 9 SCC 610 has delineated the purpose of the judiciary in such circumstances, and noted that the Supreme Court and High Courts are the “sentinels of justice” that ensure that the rule of law and Constitutional guarantees of a fair and impartial investigation into alleged criminality, are upheld. On several prior occasions, including in Bharati Tamang vs. Union of India and Others, (2013) 15 SCC 578 and Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh and Another vs. State of Gujarat and Others, (2004) 4 SCC 158 steps have been taken by Courts for monitoring the investigation of alleged criminal offences.

8. While investigating such offences, justice must not only be done, but also be seen and perceived to be done. We thus deem it appropriate to reconstitute the SIT hereinafter to preserve the faith and trust of people in the Criminal Administration of the Justice System. Further, to assure full and complete justice to the victims of crime, we are inclined to order that the ongoing investigation be monitored by a retired High Court Judge, who too may not have his roots in the State of Uttar Pradesh. We, therefore, appoint Justice (Retd.) Rakesh Kumar Jain, a former Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, to monitor the ongoing investigation so as to ensure transparency, fairness and absolute impartiality in the outcome of the investigation in the Lakhimpur Kheri incident which is to be conducted in a time-bound manner.

9. We are informed that the present SIT predominantly comprises of middle level/subordinate level police officers posted i


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top