SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 1146

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
N.V. RAMANA, CJI., SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI, JJ.
IN RE: VIOLENCE IN LAKHIMPUR KHERI (U.P.) LEADING TO LOSS OF LIFE
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 426 of 2021
Decided On : 17-11-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: By Courts Motion Mr. Shiv Kumar Tripathi, Adv., Mr. C.S. Panda, Adv., Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Maurya, Adv., Mr. Shiv Kumar Vats, Adv., Mr. Goverdhan Dass Aggarwal, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AOR, Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, Adv., Dr. A.P. Singh, Adv., Mr. V.P. Singh, Adv., Ms. Geeta Chauhan, Adv., Mr. Sadashiv, AOR, Mr. Harshvir Pratap Sharma, Sr. Adv., Ms. Astha Tyagi, AOR, Mr. Dinesh Chander Trehan, Adv., Mr. Vyom Chaturvedi, Adv., Mr. Harish Salve, Sr. Adv., Ms. Garima Prashad, AAG, UP Mr. Shantanu Singh, Adv., Mr. Akshay Chowdhary, Adv., Ms. Ruchira Goel, AOR

The central legal point established in the judgment is the judiciary's role as 'sentinels of justice' to ensure fair and impartial investigations into alleged criminal offences, as well as the need for transparency, fairness, and expeditiousness in the investigation process.

Headnote:

SENTINELS OF JUSTICE - PIL arising from incident during farmers' protests - Court reconstitutes SIT and appoints Monitoring Judge to ensure fair and impartial investigation

Fact of the Case:

The PIL arises from an incident during the farmers' protests in which several protesters were killed and injured after being rammed and run over by vehicles. The Court was approached for an independent and federal inquiry into the incident.

Finding of the Court:

The Court reconstituted the Special Investigation Team (SIT) and appointed a retired High Court Judge as a Monitoring Judge to ensure transparency, fairness, and impartiality in the ongoing investigation. The Court expressed concerns about the fairness and independence of the initial investigation and emphasized the need for an expeditious and thorough investigation.

Issues: Fairness of ongoing investigation, reconstitution of SIT, appointment of Monitoring Judge, expeditious conclusion of investigation

Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the principles outlined in Babubhai Jamnadas Patel v. State of Gujarat & Ors., (2009) 9 SCC 610, Bharati Tamang v. Union of India & Ors., (2013) 15 SCC 578, and Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh & Anr. v. State of Gujarat & Ors., (2004) 4 SCC 158, emphasizing the judiciary's role as 'sentinels of justice' to ensure fair and impartial investigations into alleged criminal offences.

Final Decision: The Court directed the reconstitution of the SIT with directly recruited IPS officers and appointed a retired High Court Judge as a Monitoring Judge to oversee the ongoing investigation. The SIT was instructed to conclude the investigation expeditiously and file the charge-sheet, with the State of Uttar Pradesh directed to provide necessary support to the Monitoring Judge.

ORDER :

The Court is convened through hybrid mode.

2. The present PIL arises in the background of an incident which took place in Tikunia in the Lakhimpur Kheri District of Uttar Pradesh, during the farmers’ protests against the Indian Agricultural Acts of 2020. On October 3rd 2021, several protesters had been blocking the road to restrict passage for the UP Deputy Chief Minister who was on his way to Banbirpur village. While standing and/or walking on the road, these protesters were rammed from behind by a Mahindra Thar SUV, and then run over by the same vehicle. Two other vehicles that were part of the same convoy also ran over those who had already been thrown to the ground and crushed by the first SUV. The incident resulted in 8 deaths and several suffered injuries. This Court was seized of the matter when two lawyers wrote to this Court seeking an independent and federal inquiry into the incident.

3. The matter is currently under investigation by the local police, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been formed, and some arrests have been made. Given the nascent stage of the investigation, we are consciously reluctant to make any observation on the merits of the case, as that would have an impact on the parties involved and influence the prosecuting agency and the courts which would ultimately look into the case.

4. During the course of hearing on 8.11.2021, 12.11.2021 and 15.11.2021, some of the parties questioned the fairness of the ongoing investigation. Hence we proposed to appoint a former Judge of the High Court to monitor the investigation and also to induct new Members in the SIT who may carry out the investigation, uninfluenced by any consideration. Shri Harish Salve, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh sought time to have instructions and thereafter on 15.11.2021, he very fairly stated that the State Government has no objection to the recourse suggested by this Court.

5. This Court is equally concerned about guaranteeing an impartial, fair, just and thorough investigation into the incident which has resulted in such a tragic loss of lives of protesters as well as some other persons.

6. Earlier hereto, we have expressed our disapproval on the slow pace, manner and outcome of the investigation conducted so far, as well as the composition of the SIT charged with investigating the matter.

7. This Court in Babubhai Jamnadas Patel v. State of Gujarat & Ors., (2009) 9 SCC 610 has delineated the purpose of the judiciary in such circumstances, and noted that the Supreme Court and High Courts are the “sentinels of justice” that ensure that the rule of law and Constitutional guarantees of a fair and impartial investigation into alleged criminality, are upheld. On several prior occasions, including in Bharati Tamang v. Union of India & Ors., (2013) 15 SCC 578 and Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh & Anr. v. State of Gujarat & Ors., (2004) 4 SCC 158 steps have been taken by Courts for monitoring the investigation of alleged criminal offences.

8. While investigating such offences, justice must not only be done, but also be seen and perceived to be done. We thus deem it appropriate to reconstitute the SIT hereinafter to preserve the faith and trust of people in the Criminal Administration of the Justice System. Further, to assure full and complete justice to the victims of crime, we are inclined to order that the ongoing investigation be monitored by a retired High Court Judge, who too may not have his roots in the State of Uttar Pradesh. We, therefore, appoint Justice (Retd.) Rakesh Kumar Jain, a former Judge of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, to monitor the ongoing investigation so as to ensure transparency, fairness and absolute impartiality in the outcome of the investigation in the Lakhimpur Kheri incident which is to be conducted in a timebound manner.

9. We are informed that the present SIT predominantly comprises of middle level/subordinate level police officers posted in district Lakhimpur Kher

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top