Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 90

B. R. GAVAI, VIKRAM NATH
Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by The Inspector of Police – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : In Crl.A.636/2010 : Dr. Yug Mohit Chaudhury,Adv. Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian,Adv. Mr. Anush Shetty,Adv. Mr. Raghunatha Sethupatjhy B.,Adv. Mr. Bharathimohan M.,Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv. Mr. Shreeharee Jaganmohan,Adv. Ms. Priya R.,Adv. Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR
In Crl.A.639/2010 & Crl.A.496/2012 : Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal,Sr.Adv. Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian,Adv. Ms. Arshiya Ghose,Adv. Ms. Sowjhanhya Shankaran,Adv. Mr. Raghunatha Sethupatjhy B.,Adv. Mr. Bharathimohan M.,Adv. Ms. Priya R.,Adv. Mr. Shreeharee Jaganmohan,Adv. Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR Mr. Avinash Kumar,Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., AOR Mr. Shobhit Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Vaidehi Rastogi, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

B.R. GAVAI, J.

1. The present appeals challenge the judgment dated 19th February 2009 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras, thereby dismissing the appeals filed by the appellants herein and affirming the judgment dated 14th November 2007 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur District (hereinafter referred to as “the trial court”), thereby convicting the appellants herein for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, “IPC”) and sentencing them to suffer life imprisonment. The trial court further convicted the appellants herein under Section 109 read with Section 201, Section 109 read with Section 182 and Sections 120B and 148 of the IPC and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for the different periods under the said Sections.

2. The prosecution story, in brief, is as under:

Deceased M.R. Ravi was carrying on real estate business in Yadaval Street, Padi. He also happened to be the Town Secretary of AIADMK party of Ambattur. It is the prosecution case that accused Nos. 1 and 11 also belonged to the same political party. Accused Nos. 12 to 14 were c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 90

B. R. GAVAI, VIKRAM NATHStalin @ Satalin Samuvel – AppellantVersusState Represented by The Inspector of Police – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

B. R. GAVAI, VIKRAM NATH
Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by The Inspector of Police – Respondent