SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 141

KRISHNA MURARI, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Ramesh Chandra Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Prashant Kanha, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Shrivastava, AOR Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.G. Hasnain, Sr. Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, AOR Mr. Syed Mohd. Fazal, Adv. Ms. Azra Rehman, Adv. Mr. M.Z. Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kant, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Simranjeet Singh Rekhi, Adv. Mr. Harsh Jain, Adv. Mr. Shubham Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Ravindra Kumar Raizada, Sr. A.A.G. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, AOR Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Binay Kumar Das, AOR Ms. Neha Das, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Kant, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, AOR Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv. Ms. Rani Mishra, Adv. Mr. Omanakuttan K. K., AOR

Table of Content
1. overview of land acquisition and classification (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 9 , 10)
2. court's observations on historical context and classification terms (Para 6 , 8 , 18)
3. arguments presented by both parties regarding compensation (Para 20 , 21)
4. legal principles regarding rights to compensation (Para 22 , 28 , 60)
5. court's analysis on legality of classification (Para 24 , 31 , 58)
6. final conclusion and order of the court (Para 67 , 68 , 69)

Krishna Murari, J.

1.1 Writ Petition No. 61449 of 2009, Smt. Madhuri Srivasatava Vs. State of U.P. & Ors., (2016) 6 SCC OnLine AII 2832 along with other connected petitions were filed by certain landholders whose land was acquired by NOIDA challenging the decision of the Board of Directors of NOIDA dated 07.01.1998 as also the approval granted to the said resolution by the State Government dated 02.03.2009 whereby a distinction was carved out in the matter of payment of compensation by creating a classification between “Pushtaini” and “Gair-pushtaini” landholders. The ‘Pushtaini’ landholders whose lands were acquired, were given

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top