SURYA KANT, K. V. VISWANATHAN
New Okhla Industrial Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Harnand Singh (Deceased) through LRs – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURYA KANT, J.
Delay condoned. Leave granted.
2. These appeals and applications have been preferred by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (hereinafter, ‘NOIDA’) and landowners owning land in Village Chhalera Bangar, Tehsil Dadri, District Ghaziabad, contesting various identical impugned orders, including the judgment dated 08.02.2021 and in the review order dated 22.07.2021 passed in the lead case by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (hereinafter, ‘High Court’), enhancing the compensation granted to the landowners for an acquisition initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter, ‘1894 Act’). In the appeals preferred by NOIDA, the High Court has enhanced the rate of compensation from the range of INR 222 and 233 per sq. yd. as granted by the Additional District Judge, Ghaziabad (hereinafter, ‘Reference Court’), to INR 449 per sq. yd. Whereas, in the appeals and applications filed by the landowners, it was enhanced to INR 340 per sq. yd.
A. FACTS
3. The present controversy has a chequered history. The acquisition process was initiated by State of U.P./NOIDA on 05.01.1991 through a notification issued under Section 4(1) of the 1894 Act, for the
Ramsingbhai Jerambhai v. State of Gujarat
Administrator General of W.B. v. Collector
Ram Kanwar v. State of Haryana, (2020) 17 SCC 232
Shaji Kuriakose v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd.
ONGC Ltd. v. Rameshbhai Jivanbhai Patel
Atma Singh v. State of Haryana and others
Trishala Jain v. State of Uttaranchal
ONGC Ltd. v. Rameshbhai Jivanbhai Patel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.