State of Haryana vs Satpal - 2023 Supreme(SC) 187

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 187

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Satpal – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Rakesh Mudgal, A.A.G. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Amrita Verma, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv.
For the Respondent(sssssssssssssssssssss) Mr. Surender Deswal, Adv. Mr. Abhaya Nath Das, Adv. Mr. S S Bandyopadhyay, Adv. Ms. Beena, Adv. Mr. Rahul Singh, Adv. Mr. V K Shukla, Adv. Ms. Riya Soni, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR

JUDGMENT :

M.R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 12.05.2016 in C.W.P. No. 3167 of 2015 and the order dated 21.10.2016 passed in Review application No. 284 of 2016 in CWP No. 3167 of 2015, the State of Haryana and Ors. have preferred the present appeals.

2. The facts leading to the present appeals in nutshell are as under:-

2.1 At the outset, it is required to be noted that the contesting respondents are in unauthorized possession of the land comprising Khasra Nos. 61/2 and 62, which belong to the Gram Panchayat. On the Application of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, a Demarcation was carried out with regard to Khasra Nos. 61/2 and 62 in which the unauthorized possession of the respondents-original writ petitioners has been shown.

2.2 Eviction proceedings were initiated on 25.03.2009 by filing the ejectment application under Section 7(2) of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act. Assistant Collector passed the ejectment order dated 30.08.2011 against the contesting

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 187

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNAState of Haryana – AppellantVersusSatpal – Respondent

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Satpal – Respondent