SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 198

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ABHAY S. OKA
B. Ravi Prakash Etc. – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Adv. M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR Mr. Dharm Singh, Adv. Mr. Suraj Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Akhila Wali, Adv. Mr. Shivaswaroop, Adv. Mr. Devdatt Kamat, Sr. Adv. Mr. K. Parameshwar, Adv. Mr. M.V. Mukunda, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, Adv. Mr. Harsh Pandey, Adv. Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nishanth Patil, AOR Mr. Ayush P Shah, Adv. Mr. S.J. Amith, Adv. Mr. Purushottam Sharma, Adv. Ms. Vani Vyas, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha Purushotham, Adv. Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Amit Guar, Adv. Mr. Ashim Sood, Adv. Mr. Ashish Rana, AOR Mr. Nilesh Mudgil, Adv.

ORDER

Leave granted.

2. Delay in filing substitution is condoned.

3. Application for brining the legal representatives on record is allowed.

4. These appeals arise out of acquisition proceedings under the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1966 Act”]. The first respondent-Board was constituted under the 1966 Act. On 05.02.2010, a Notification under sub-Section (1) of Section 28 of the 1966 Act notifying lands totally admeasuring 4993.65 acres specifically for acquisition for the purposes of development of respondent No.3 Company [Arcelor Mittal India Pvt. Ltd.]/beneficiary Company. The Final Notification under sub-Section (4) of Section 28 of the 1966 Act was issued on 04.05.2010 which again specifically mentions that the lands subject matter of the Notification are being acquired for the benefit of the beneficiary Company. As a result of the Notification under sub-Section (4) of Section 28, the total land admeasuring 4864.64 acres vested in the State Government by virtue of sub-Section (5) of Section 28.

5. The second respondent-Special Land Acquisition Officer made an Award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter re


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top