SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ABHAY S. OKA
B. Ravi Prakash Etc. – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board – Respondent
ORDER
Leave granted.
2. Delay in filing substitution is condoned.
3. Application for brining the legal representatives on record is allowed.
4. These appeals arise out of acquisition proceedings under the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1966 Act”]. The first respondent-Board was constituted under the 1966 Act. On 05.02.2010, a Notification under sub-Section (1) of Section 28 of the 1966 Act notifying lands totally admeasuring 4993.65 acres specifically for acquisition for the purposes of development of respondent No.3 Company [Arcelor Mittal India Pvt. Ltd.]/beneficiary Company. The Final Notification under sub-Section (4) of Section 28 of the 1966 Act was issued on 04.05.2010 which again specifically mentions that the lands subject matter of the Notification are being acquired for the benefit of the beneficiary Company. As a result of the Notification under sub-Section (4) of Section 28, the total land admeasuring 4864.64 acres vested in the State Government by virtue of sub-Section (5) of Section 28.
5. The second respondent-Special Land Acquisition Officer made an Award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.