SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1692

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI., Sanjiv Khanna, J.
State of Gujarat & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Pravinkumar R. Patel – Respondent
Review Petition (Civil.) D.No.9241 of 2021 in SLP (Civil) No. 33633 of 2017
Decided On : 01-11-2022

Courts may refuse to condone delay in filing petitions if the explanation offered is unsatisfactory.

Headnote:

Delay - Review Petition - The court refused to condone the delay of 794 days in preferring the Review Petition, leading to its dismissal on the ground of limitation.

Fact of the Case:

The Review Petition was delayed by 794 days.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the explanation for the delay unsatisfactory and refused to condone it, resulting in the dismissal of the Review Petition.

Issues: Delay in Review Petition

Ratio Decidendi: Refusal to condone delay due to unsatisfactory explanation

Final Decision: Dismissal of the Review Petition due to delay

ORDER

1. There is delay of 794 days in preferring the instant Review Petition.

2. The explanation offered in the application for condonation of delay is not satisfactory at all.

3. We refuse to condone the delay. Consequently, the instant Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of limitation.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top