SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI., Sanjiv Khanna, J.
State of Gujarat & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Pravinkumar R. Patel – Respondent
Review Petition (Civil.) D.No.9241 of 2021 in SLP (Civil) No. 33633 of 2017
Decided On : 01-11-2022
Delay - Review Petition - The court refused to condone the delay of 794 days in preferring the Review Petition, leading to its dismissal on the ground of limitation.
Fact of the Case:
The Review Petition was delayed by 794 days.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the explanation for the delay unsatisfactory and refused to condone it, resulting in the dismissal of the Review Petition.
Issues: Delay in Review Petition
Ratio Decidendi: Refusal to condone delay due to unsatisfactory explanation
Final Decision: Dismissal of the Review Petition due to delay
ORDER
1. There is delay of 794 days in preferring the instant Review Petition.
2. The explanation offered in the application for condonation of delay is not satisfactory at all.
3. We refuse to condone the delay. Consequently, the instant Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of limitation.
Courts may refuse to condone delay in filing petitions if the explanation offered is unsatisfactory.
Courts may reject Review Petitions on the ground of delay if the explanation for the delay is unsatisfactory.
Courts may refuse to condone delay in filing a Review Petition if the explanation offered for seeking condonation of delay is found unsatisfactory.
Courts may refuse to condone delays in filing petitions if the explanation offered is unsatisfactory.
The court has the discretion to condone delay in preferring a Review Petition and may dismiss the petition if no error apparent on record justifies interference.
Refusal to condone delay in review petition and its impact on the dismissal of the petition.
The court emphasized the stringent requirements for condoning delays in review applications, necessitating a clear demonstration of sufficient cause.
The dismissal of the Review Petition due to the absence of a substantial question of law and the failure to establish any error apparent on record.
A delay in filing a review application is not condoned without a sufficient and bona fide reason, especially when negligence or inaction is evident.
The court upheld the dismissal of a Review Petition due to insufficient grounds for condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.