SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1335

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Surya Kant, JJ.
Siddharthshankar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 656 of 2021
Decided On : 07-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Mayank Kshirsagar, Advocate, Ms. Pankhuri, Advocate, For the Appellant / Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG, Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG, Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Advocate, Mr. Rajat Nair, Advocate, Mr. Ketan Paul, Advocate, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Advocate, Mr. Zoheb ossain, Advocate, For the Respondent.

The main legal point established is that Aadhaar card is not a mandatory precondition for availing vaccination facilities, and alternative identity documents can be used.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Aadhaar Details for Vaccination - The court disposed of the petition seeking the elimination of the mandatory precondition of submitting Aadhaar details in the CO-WIN portal for vaccination, as the counter affidavit clarified that Aadhaar card is not mandatory for registration and alternative identity documents can be used.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a writ to eliminate the mandatory precondition of submitting Aadhaar details in the CO-WIN portal for vaccination. The Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare clarified that Aadhaar card is not mandatory for registration and alternative identity documents can be used.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition as the counter affidavit clarified that Aadhaar card is not mandatory for registration and alternative identity documents can be used. The grievance of the petitioner was met, and all concerned authorities were directed to act in pursuance of the stated policy.

Issues: The issues involved the mandatory precondition of submitting Aadhaar details in the CO-WIN portal for vaccination and the denial of vaccination for failure to produce an Aadhaar card.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the clarification in the counter affidavit that Aadhaar card is not mandatory for registration on the CO-WIN portal and that alternative identity documents can be used.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, and all concerned authorities were directed to act in pursuance of the stated policy. Pending application, if any, was disposed of.

ORDER

1 The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution has been invoked for seeking the following reliefs:

    A. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, direction directing the Respondent No.1 to eliminate the mandatory precondition of submitting Aadhaar details in the CO-WIN portal for the Vaccination Center/Vaccinator while verifying an individual for administration of vaccine, across the territory of India immediately;

    B. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, direction directing the Respondent No.2 to henceforth make the necessary changes to the CO-WIN portal in consonance with the relief sought in Prayer (A) above;

    C. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, direction directing the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to update the CO-WIN portal with appropriate software/technical know-how rendering the same user-friendly, easy to use and access for all the citizens of India;"

2 Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 1 October 2021 issuing notice, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. The counter affidavit specifically records that the submission of an Aadhar card is not a mandatory pre-condition for registration on the Co-win portal and, as a matter of fact, any of nine identity documents can be produced. For convenience of reference, paragraph 8 of the counter affidavit is extracted below:

    8. It is humbly submitted that Aadhar card is not mandatory for the registration of beneficiary on the Co-WIN portal. The Beneficiaries can register on the Co-WIN portal using any of the following prescribed photo ID proofs namely:

    i. Aadhar Card

    ii Driving License

    iii PAN card

    iv Passport

    v. Pension Passbook

    vi NPR Smart Card

    vii Voter ID(EPIC)

    viii Ration Card

    ix Unique Disability ID (UDID) or Disability Certificate with picture

    The aforesaid information is also available on the Co-WIN portal and can be accessed at following link https://www.cowin.gov.in/faq"

3. Apart from the above averment, it has also been stated in the counter affidavit that a provision has been made to conduct vaccination sessions for other categories of persons who may not have any identity cards in their possession at all, including persons without a fixed place of abode, prison inmates, inmates in mental health institutions, persons in old age homes and road side beggars.

4. Mr Aman Sharma, counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India, states on instructions, that 87 lakh people who did not possess any identity card have also been vaccinated in the ongoing process.

5. The grievance of the petitioner that he was denied the facility of a vaccination for failure to produce an Aadhar card has also been dealt with in the counter affidavit. It has been stated that the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare addressed a communication dated 2 November 2021 to the Principal Secretary of the Health and Family Welfare Department of the State of Maharashtra to take action against the concerned private CVC for denying vaccination to the petitioner despite the production of a valid passport ID.

6. In view of the clarifications which have been made in the counter affidavit to the effect that production of an Aadhar card is not a mandatory pre-condition for availing of vaccination facilities, the grievance of the petitioner is duly met. All concerned authorities shall act in pursuance of the stated policy which has been extracted in paragraph 8 of the counter affidavit.

7 The petition is accordingly disposed of.

8 Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top