VINEET SARAN, ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Puran Mal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. The respondent no. 2 (Mahesh Kumar) is an accused in a case for offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC'). The bail application of the respondent no. 2 was rejected by the Trial Court on two occasions. Thereafter, the High Court has allowed the bail application of the respondent no. 2. The complainant has filed this appeal by way of special leave petition questioning legality of the order granting bail to the respondent no.2.
3. In brief, the facts of the case are that the deceased, who was the brother of the complainant/appellant, had received fatal injuries and died between the night intervening 16/17.06.2020.
4. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant seeking, in substance, cancellation of the order granting bail is that there was a long standing rivalry between the deceased and the respondent no. 2 and on 16.06.2020 evening itself there was a scuffle between the two in which the deceased had received injuries and he had lodged a complaint in his own handwriting with the police station at 08.00 p.m. (which was registered subsequently on the next date). After lodging FIR, the deceased had gone to the hospital
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav and Anr. [(2004) 7 SCC 528]
Niranjan Singh & Anr. vs. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote & Ors. [(1980) 2 SCC 559]
Prabhakar Tewari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. [(2020) 11 SCC 648]
Ram Govind Upadhyay vs. Sudarshan Singh and Ors. [(2002) 3 SCC 598]
State of U.P. through CBI vs. Amarmani Tripathi [(2005) 8 SCC 21]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.