SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Surya Kant, JJ.
Nims University – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No 316 of 2022
Decided On : 09-05-2022
NEET - Super Specialty - Proviso to Regulation 9(3) of the Post-Graduate Medical Education Regulations 2000 - The Court declined to reduce the percentile for admission to Super Specialty courses, citing the apex nature of these courses and the need to maintain high standards. However, a mop-up round of counselling was ordered to fill the vacant seats.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought directions to lower the cut off percentile for admission to Super Specialty courses and to conduct a mop up and stray vacancy round of the NEET - Super Specialty counselling to fill up vacant seats.
Finding of the Court:
The Court declined to reduce the percentile for admission to Super Specialty courses, citing the need to maintain high standards. However, a mop-up round of counselling was ordered to fill the vacant seats.
Issues: Whether the eligibility percentile for Super Specialty courses should be reduced to fill vacant seats.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the reasons for declining to reduce the percentile were not extraneous or arbitrary, considering the apex nature of Super Specialty courses. A mop-up round of counselling was ordered to fill the vacant seats.
Final Decision: The Court declined to reduce the percentile for admission to Super Specialty courses but ordered a mop-up round of counselling to fill the vacant seats.
JUDGMENT
Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J - In these proceedings under Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioners seek directions (a) for the lowering of the cut off percentile for admission to Super Specialty courses; and (ii) to the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) to conduct a mop up and stray vacancy round of the NEET - Super Specialty counselling to fill up seats which are vacant for the DM/MCh courses.
2. On 5 April 2018, Gazette Notification No MCI-19(I)/2018-Med./100818 was issued by the then Medical Council of India in the following terms:
"In order to be eligible for admission to Postgraduate Course for an academic year, it shall be necessary for a candidate to obtain minimum of marks at 50th percentile in the National Eligibility-Cum-Entrance Test for Postgraduate courses held for the said academic year. However, in respect of candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes, the minimum marks shall be at 40th percentile. In respect of candidates with benchmark disabilities specified under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016, the minimum marks shall be at 45th percentile for General Category and 40th percentile for SC/ST/OBC. The percentile shall be determined on the basis of highest marks secured in the All India Common merit list in National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test for Postgraduate courses.
Provided when sufficient number of candidates in the respective categories fail to secure minimum marks as prescribed in National Eligibility-cum-Entrances Test held for any academic year for admission to Postgraduate Courses, the Central Government in consultation with Medical Council of India may at its discretion lower the minimum marks required for admission to Post Graduate Course for candidates belonging to respective categories and marks so lowered by the Central Government shall be applicable for the academic year only."
3. The respondents have declined to exercise the power under the above proviso to reduce the eligibility percentile below 50 for the current year. This has resulted in the invocation of the jurisdiction under Article 32.
4. Mr P S Patwalia, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that 940 Super Specialty seats are vacant for academic year 2021-2022 and that it will be a colossal waste of scarce resources if these seats are not filled up. Moreover, it was submitted that during the previous academic years, 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, the cut off percentile which was initially fixed at 50 was reduced to 30 (for 2019-2020) and 45 (for 20202021). Moreover, it has been submitted that the cut off percentile has been reduced in the case of admissions in respect of post graduate medical courses and hence there is no reason why a distinction should be made for Super Specialty courses.
5. Ms Aishwarya Bhati, Additional Solicitor General has tendered a note on record. The note contains the following comparative tables:
"For Academic Year 2019-20
| Total Seats | Percentile | Eligible candidates | Vacant Seats |
| 3183 | 50 | 10,037 | 809 |
| 3183 | 30 | 11,930 | 537 |
For Academic Year 2020-21
| Total Seats | Percentile | Eligible candidates | Vacant Seats |
| 3693 | 50 | 10,359 | 916 |
| 3693 | 45 | 11,149 | 825 |
For Academic Year 2021-22
| Total Seats | Percentile | Eligible candidates | Vacant Seats |
| 4691 | 50 | 9850 | 940 |
6. The above table indicates that during 2019-2020, the eligibility percentile of 50 was reduced to 30 as a result of which the number of vacant seats came down by 272 from 809 to 537. For 2020-2021, the percentile was reduced from 50 to 45, as a result of which the number of vacancies reduced from the original 916 seats to 825. For the current academic year 2021-2022, the percentile has been maintained at 50 for Super Specialty courses resulting in 940 vacant seats. The table is only a broad indication because the
The Court emphasized the need to maintain high standards in Super Specialty courses and declined to reduce the eligibility percentile, citing the apex nature of these courses.
The decision of the Union Government to not reduce the percentile for admission to the BDS course was set aside on the ground of illegality and irrationality. The court found that there was no manife....
The discretion vested by Regulation 2(d) is applicable in a situation where there are insufficient candidates in the respective categories who have scored the minimum marks in the NEET. Interference ....
: If the criteria for minimum percentile is further reduced, this Court is doubtful about the standard of the students taking admission and is wary of their potential to undertake the professional co....
The court emphasized the need for balanced admission policies to fill vacancies in Homoeopathy colleges without compromising educational standards, recommending criteria for effective implementation ....
Discretion under regulations for educational admissions must be exercised considering only pertinent factors, and the Union's refusal to further lower NEET percentile requirements was lawful given th....
(1) Judicial review of administrative action is permissible on grounds of illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety – An administrative decision is flawed if it is illegal.(2) If reducing ....
The court upheld the minimum percentile requirement for postgraduate medical admissions, asserting the importance of maintaining high educational standards in medical education, which cannot be compr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.