SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1943

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
JAYANT BANERJI, K.V.ARAVIND, JJ.
 
Karnataka Private Homoeopathic Medical College Managements Association, Represented By Its General Secretary, Sri. K. Chandrashekar, S/o. Sri. Hanumanthappa – Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India, Represented By Its Secretary – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 37205 Of 2025 (EDN-RES)
Decided On : 19-12-2025
 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri Vikram Huilgol, Senior Advocate For Sri Dileep C. G., Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri H. Shanti Bhushan, Dsgi. A/W, Smt. Reshma Thammaiah, Cgc., Sri Abhimanyu Devaiah, Smt. N. Anitha, Aga., Sri N.K. Ramesh, Adv.

The court emphasized the need for balanced admission policies to fill vacancies in Homoeopathy colleges without compromising educational standards, recommending criteria for effective implementation of regulations.

Headnote:(A) National Commission for Homoeopathy Act, 2020 - Regulations 2022, Clause (3) - Admissions to Homoeopathic colleges - Petitioners contend that fixation of NEET percentile at the 50th percentile adversely affects admissions and creates disparity; sought reduction of percentile to fill vacant seats - Court acknowledges disparity in vacancies across states and emphasizes the necessity for established criteria in implementing admissions policies. (Paras 3.1, 4, 12, 17)

(B) Academic Policy - Central Government’s instructions maintain existing percentiles to preserve educational standards but the previous year's reduction led to significant fill rates in colleges, showing a need for a balanced approach to fill vacancies without undermining quality. (Paras 6, 12)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners are a registered Association of Homoeopathic Medical Colleges along with individual Private Un-aided/Self-financed Medical Colleges. They challenge the NEET percentile and seek the right to admit students at lower scores due to the significant number of seats remaining vacant for the BHMS Course, attributed to stringent percentile requirements.

Findings of Court:
The court highlighted the discrepancies in vacancy rates across states and encouraged the Government to establish a clear criterion for addressing admission policies in private Homoeopathic Colleges.

Issues: The primary issue concerned the disparity for admissions criteria in Homoeopathy and the need for regulated admission standards that do not compromise educational integrity.

Ratio Decidendi: The court stressed that while the preservation of academic standards is crucial, the necessity to address significant admissions vacancies must also be considered, signaling a need for a pragmatic approach to filling seats.

Result: Petition disposed of, with recommendations for consideration by the Central Government.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek reduction of neet percentile. (Para 2 , 3)
2. supreme court ruling on admission standards cited. (Para 4 , 5)
3. balance between educational quality and filling vacancies. (Para 6 , 12 , 13)
4. admission statistics reflect varying vacancy rates. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
5. concerns over vacancy management in admissions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. final orders disposing of the petition. (Para 18)

ORDER :

JAYANT BANERJI, J.

1. Heard Sri Vikram Huilgol, learned Senior counsel appearing for Sri C.G. Dileep, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri H. Shanthi Bhushan, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India along with Smt. Reshma Thammaiah, learned Central Government Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 3; Sri Abhimanyu Devaiah, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Smt. N. Anitha, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 5 and Sri N.K. Ramesh, learned counsel for respondent No.6.

2. This petition is filed with the following prayers;

"(i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ/Order/Direction to the Respondents to fill all the unfilled/vacant seats with reduction of minimum percentile/percentage i.e., 25th percentile affixed for NEET eligibility as per Regulation 4(3) of NCH (MSUAE) Regulations 2022 and/or till filing up of the vacant seats in the Petitioners Colleges and/or zero percentile who have secured less marks as done by Government of India, Directorate General of Health Services, Medical Counseling Committee in respect of PG Courses for the academic year 2023.

(ii) Or in the alternative issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ/Order/Direction to the Respondents to reimburse the fees amount for vacant seats to all Petitioner's colleges for the academic year 2025-26.

(iii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity."

3. Petitioner No.1 is a registered Association of Homoeopathic Medical Colleges; petitioner Nos.2 to 17 are private Un-aided/Self-financed Medical Colleges, who are members of petitioner No.1; Respondent No.2 is established by the Central Government under the National Commission for Homoeopathy Act, 2020; Respondent No.3 is a Board constituted under respondent No.2 for assessing the Homoeopathic Medical Colleges; respondent Nos.4 and 5 are constituted by the State Government to monitor AYUSH Medical Colleges; respondent No.6 is constituted by the State Government to allot Medical/Dental/AYUSH Courses Seats as per the Seat Matrix given by the State Government based on NEET score and respondent No.7 is a University and is the Examination Authority to the petitioners-Colleges.

3.1 From the year 2021-22, respondent No.1 adopted NEET to Homoeopathy BHMS course fixing percentile equivalent to that of AYUSH Colleges, at par with Allopathy like Medical and Dental, at 50th percentile. It is stated that generally BAMS Course Seats fill more than 95% of the vacancies, whereas Homoeopathy BHMS Course fills only 50% seats, and that too only Government Quota Seats. The fee of Government Quota Seats is less, which has resulted in financial downfall in collection of fees by the Private Un-aided/Self-financed Homoeopathic Medical Colleges.

3.2 The fixation of NEET percentile is the same for Ayurveda- BAMS course and for Homeopathy BHMS Course, which is at par with Allopathy Medical and Dental Courses. It is stated that in the State of Karnataka in Homeopathy BHMS admissions, only 30% to 50% are the seats filled-up in Private Un- aided/Self-financed Homeopathic Medical Colleges and that too, only against the Government seats. Due to reduction in filling- up of the seats, fees collections have reduced to 40% for BHMS Courses. 50% to 70% seats are vacant in Karnataka. Clause (3) of Regulation 4 of the National Commission of Homeopathy [Homeopathy Graduate Degree Course-Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery (BHMS)] Regulations, 2022, [Regulations 2022] is stated to create dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top