SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1479

AJAY RASTOGI, VIKRAM NATH
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Bhosale – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Pallav Saxena, Advocate, Ms. Shweta Kapoor, Advocate, Ms. Kheyali Singh, Advocate, For the Appellant.

ORDER

1. The present petitions have been filed by the secured creditor assailing the order dated 8th April, 2019 followed by order dated 30th April, 2019.

2. The respondent/borrower after committing default and his ccount becoming NPA, proceedings were initiated under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and on an application filed under Section 14 of the Act, the authorized officer along with the Commissioner on 29th January, 2019, took over the physical possession of the secured asset and that came to be challenged by the respondent/borrower in WP No.3702 of 2019 and thereafter further action was initiated by the petitioner in publishing the auction-cum-sale notice dated 27th February, 2019. Later WP No.7806 of 2019 came to be filed assailing the auction notice.

3. It reveals from the record that after filing of the writ petitions, the respondent/borrower approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal with an appeal SA No.109 of 2019 along with an application for stay on auction, a conditional order came to be passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal dated 28th March, 2019 directing the pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top