SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1485

INDIRA BANERJEE, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Dilip(dead) Through Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Satish – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Indira Banerjee, J. - Leave granted.

2. No one has appeared on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, in spite of notice. The Respondent-State has appeared through the learned standing counsel.

3. This appeal is against a final judgment and order dated 21.06.2019 passed by the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowing Criminal Application No. 215 of 2019 and quashing the FIR No. 394/2018 filed by the appellant, arraying Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 as accused.

4. The Appellant is the owner of House No. 463 situated at Darzi Bazar, Bhazi Market Road, Cantonment, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, which is hereinafter referred to as the 'said premises'. The father of the Respondent No. 1 was inducted as a tenant of a shop at the said premises. In 1984, the appellant and his family members filed a suit for eviction. While the said suit was pending, the appellant along with his mother inherited the said premises.

5. It is not necessary for this Court to go into the details of how the ownership of the said premises devolved on the Appellant. Suffice it to mention that the Respondent No. 1 and his mother filed a petition under Section 17 of the Hyderabad Rent Control Act in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top