SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 2090

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MADAN B. LOKUR, DEEPAK GUPTA, HEMANT GUPTA, JJ.
In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202 of 1995
Decided On : 11-12-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Amicus : Harish N. Salve, A.D.N. Rao, Sudipto Sircar, Siddhartha Chowdhury, Aparajita Singh.
For the Petitioners: Prashant Bhushan, Pranav Sachdeva, Raj Panjwani, Purnima Bhat.
For the Respondents: A.N.S. Nadkarni, Kiran Bhardwaj, Anirudh Dwivedi, Suhasini Sen, Ritesh Kumar, R. Bala, Rachna Gupta, Vikas Chaudhary, Sachin Sharma, S. Wasim A. Qadri, D.L. Chidanand, A.K. Sharma, Aayushi Singh, G.S. Makker, Amit Sharma, Ankit Raj, Nidhi Jaswal, Ruchi Kohli, D.K. Garg, Nirnimesh Dubey, Suchitra A. Chitale, Hemantika Wahi, Tarun Johri, Arjun Garg, Pragyan Sharma, Mudit Makhijani, Shikhar Garg, P.V. Yogeshwaran, Pratibha Jain, Pravin H. Parekh, Lalit Chauhan, S. Lakshmi Iyer, Sarthak Gaur, Aishwarya Dash, Vishal Prasad, Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Sumita Hazarika, Shuvodeep Roy, Jayant Mohan, Ivo D' Costa, Pawan Kishor Singh, Madhusmita Bora, A.N.S. Nadkarni, Merusagar Samantray, S.S. Rebello, Leelesh Krishna, Snehapravu Tendulkar, Babita Yadav, Amit Sharma, Ankit Raj, R.C. Kohli, Nishe Rajen Shonker, Anu K. Joy, Alim Anvar, Reegan S. Bel, Prabha Swami, Divya Swami, Nikhil Swami, Rajesh Srivastava, G. Seshagiri Rao, Sridhar Potaraju, Aruna Mathur, Avneesh Arputham, Anuradha Arputham, Geetanjali, Bhavanishankar V. Gadnis, Jayant Mohan, Anil Shrivastava, Prafulla Hegde.

The court has the authority to direct the declaration of Eco Sensitive Zones around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries in the absence of effective action by the State Governments.

Headnote:

Eco Sensitive Zone - National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries - The court directed the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change to declare an area of 10 Kms around 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as Eco Sensitive Zone due to the failure of State Governments to take effective steps in this regard.

Fact of the Case:

The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change was directed to declare an area of 10 Kms around 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as Eco Sensitive Zone due to the failure of State Governments to take effective steps in this regard.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that despite the issue being pending for 12 years, no effective steps had been taken by the State Governments in respect of the mentioned National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.

Issues: Failure of State Governments to take effective steps in declaring Eco Sensitive Zones around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.

Ratio Decidendi: The court directed the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change to declare an area of 10 Kms around the 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as Eco Sensitive Zone.

Final Decision: The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change was directed to declare an area of 10 Kms around 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as Eco Sensitive Zone due to the failure of State Governments to take effective steps in this regard.

ORDER :

1. The learned ASG has informed us that there are 104 National Parks and 558 Wildlife Sanctuaries making a total of 662 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries in the country.

2. The proposals for declaring areas around these National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as Eco Sensitive Zone have been received from State Governments/UT Administrations for 641 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. No proposals have been received in respect of 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.

3. The proposals have been accepted and Notification has been issued in respect of 289 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as on 26.11.2018 and draft Notification has been prepared in respect of 206 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.

4. The declaration with regard to Eco Sensitive Zone is under process with the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF) as well as with the State Governments in respect of 146 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.

5. We expect the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change to actively pursue the preparation of the draft Notification and to issue a final Notification at the earliest.

6. The proposals for 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries in respect of which proposals have not yet been received by the MOEF are as follows:

    ASSAM

    1. Pobitora Sanctuary

    JAMMU AND KASHMIR

    2. Hemis High Altitude National Park

    3. Kishtewar National Park

    4. Changthang Sanctuary

    5. Hokersar Sanctuary

    6. Trikuta Sanctuary

    KARNATAKA

    7. Jogimatti Sanctuary

    8. Thimlapura Sanctuary

    9. Yadahalli Chinkara Sanctuary

    MAHARASHTRA

    10. Deolgaon Rehekuri Sanctuary

    11. Thane Creek Flamingo Sanctuary

    12. Malvan Marine Sanctuary

    MANIPUR

    13. Siroi National Park

    14. Khongjaingamba Ching Sanctuary

    MEGHALAYA

    15. Baghmara Pitcher Plant Sanctuary

    NAGALAND

    16. Fakim Sanctuary

    17. Puliebadze Sanctuary

    18. Rangapahar Sanctuary

    UTTAR PRADESH

    19. Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Bird Sanctuary

    20. Pilibhit Sanctuary

    WEST BENGAL

    21. Jorepokhri Sanctuary

7. It is submitted by the learned Amicus that this issue has been pending since sometime in December, 2006. 12 years have gone-by but no effective steps have been taken by the State Governments in respect of the National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries mentioned above.

8. Under the circumstances, we direct that an area of 10 Kms around these 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries be declared as Eco Sensitive Zone by the MoEF. The declaration be made by the MoEF at the earliest.

9. Liberty is granted to the State Governments to move an application for modification of this order along with proposal only two weeks after submission of the proposals to the MoEF.

10. List the matters at the end of February, 2019.

11. In the meanwhile, interim order to continue.

I.A. NOS. 176-177 IN WRIT PETITION (C) No. 460/2004

[APPLICATIONS FOR IMPLEADMENT AND DIRECTIONS]

12. No one is present on behalf of the applicant.

13. The applications are dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top