SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MADAN B. LOKUR, DEEPAK GUPTA, HEMANT GUPTA, JJ.
In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202 of 1995
Decided On : 11-12-2018
Eco Sensitive Zone - National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries - The court directed the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change to declare an area of 10 Kms around 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as Eco Sensitive Zone due to the failure of State Governments to take effective steps in this regard.
Fact of the Case:
The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change was directed to declare an area of 10 Kms around 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as Eco Sensitive Zone due to the failure of State Governments to take effective steps in this regard.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that despite the issue being pending for 12 years, no effective steps had been taken by the State Governments in respect of the mentioned National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.
Issues: Failure of State Governments to take effective steps in declaring Eco Sensitive Zones around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.
Ratio Decidendi: The court directed the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change to declare an area of 10 Kms around the 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as Eco Sensitive Zone.
Final Decision: The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change was directed to declare an area of 10 Kms around 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as Eco Sensitive Zone due to the failure of State Governments to take effective steps in this regard.
ORDER :
1. The learned ASG has informed us that there are 104 National Parks and 558 Wildlife Sanctuaries making a total of 662 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries in the country.
2. The proposals for declaring areas around these National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as Eco Sensitive Zone have been received from State Governments/UT Administrations for 641 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. No proposals have been received in respect of 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.
3. The proposals have been accepted and Notification has been issued in respect of 289 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries as on 26.11.2018 and draft Notification has been prepared in respect of 206 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.
4. The declaration with regard to Eco Sensitive Zone is under process with the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF) as well as with the State Governments in respect of 146 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.
5. We expect the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change to actively pursue the preparation of the draft Notification and to issue a final Notification at the earliest.
6. The proposals for 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries in respect of which proposals have not yet been received by the MOEF are as follows:
1. Pobitora Sanctuary
JAMMU AND KASHMIR
2. Hemis High Altitude National Park
3. Kishtewar National Park
4. Changthang Sanctuary
5. Hokersar Sanctuary
6. Trikuta Sanctuary
KARNATAKA
7. Jogimatti Sanctuary
8. Thimlapura Sanctuary
9. Yadahalli Chinkara Sanctuary
MAHARASHTRA
10. Deolgaon Rehekuri Sanctuary
11. Thane Creek Flamingo Sanctuary
12. Malvan Marine Sanctuary
MANIPUR
13. Siroi National Park
14. Khongjaingamba Ching Sanctuary
MEGHALAYA
15. Baghmara Pitcher Plant Sanctuary
NAGALAND
16. Fakim Sanctuary
17. Puliebadze Sanctuary
18. Rangapahar Sanctuary
UTTAR PRADESH
19. Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Bird Sanctuary
20. Pilibhit Sanctuary
WEST BENGAL
21. Jorepokhri Sanctuary
7. It is submitted by the learned Amicus that this issue has been pending since sometime in December, 2006. 12 years have gone-by but no effective steps have been taken by the State Governments in respect of the National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries mentioned above.
8. Under the circumstances, we direct that an area of 10 Kms around these 21 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries be declared as Eco Sensitive Zone by the MoEF. The declaration be made by the MoEF at the earliest.
9. Liberty is granted to the State Governments to move an application for modification of this order along with proposal only two weeks after submission of the proposals to the MoEF.
10. List the matters at the end of February, 2019.
11. In the meanwhile, interim order to continue.
I.A. NOS. 176-177 IN WRIT PETITION (C) No. 460/2004
[APPLICATIONS FOR IMPLEADMENT AND DIRECTIONS]
12. No one is present on behalf of the applicant.
13. The applications are dismissed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.