Suneja Towers Private Limited vs Anita Merchant

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 374

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMAR
Suneja Towers Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Anita Merchant – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Mrs. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Arvind Ray, Adv. Mr. Karan Gupta, Adv. Ms. Vansha S Suneja, Adv. M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Viksit Arora, Adv. Ms. Supriya Juneja, AOR

Table of Content
1. complaint's maintainability and factual background. (Para 2)
2. rival arguments regarding interest and compensation. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
3. court's observations on compound interest and related judgments. (Para 12 , 13 , 19 , 22)
4. analysis of decision in dr. monga's case and its implications. (Para 16 , 21)
5. conclusion allowing respondent to retain previously received payments. (Para 28)

DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.

Preliminary and brief outline

2. In these appeals by special leave, the appellants have essentially questioned a part of the common judgment and order dated 31.03.2022, as passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi¹[Hereinafter also referred to as ‘the National Commission’.] in Revision Petition Nos. 771 of 2020, 772 of 2020 and 773 of 2020, whereby the National Commission has declined to interfere in the common judgment and order dated 12.03.2020, as passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi²[Hereinafter also refer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 374

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMARSuneja Towers Private Limited – AppellantVersusAnita Merchant – Respondent

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMAR
Suneja Towers Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Anita Merchant – Respondent