Suneja Towers Private Limited vs Anita Merchant

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 374

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMAR
Suneja Towers Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Anita Merchant – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. Mrs. Vanita Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Arvind Ray, Adv. Mr. Karan Gupta, Adv. Ms. Vansha S Suneja, Adv. M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Viksit Arora, Adv. Ms. Supriya Juneja, AOR

Table of Content
1. complaint's maintainability and factual background. (Para 2)
2. rival arguments regarding interest and compensation. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
3. court's observations on compound interest and related judgments. (Para 12 , 13 , 19 , 22)
4. analysis of decision in dr. monga's case and its implications. (Para 16 , 21)
5. conclusion allowing respondent to retain previously received payments. (Para 28)

JUDGMENT :

DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.

	Table of Contents
Preliminary and brief outline
Relevant factual and background aspects
The State Commission awarding compound interest
Approval by the National Commission
Rival Contentions
Matters of form and pleading not relevant in the present case
The cited decisions on award of interest in real estate dealings.
The decision in Manjeet Kaur Monga’s Case and its connotations
The complexities of present matter requiring further exploration In extraordinary measure, money received by respondent all

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 374

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMARSuneja Towers Private Limited – AppellantVersusAnita Merchant – Respondent

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMAR
Suneja Towers Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Anita Merchant – Respondent