SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SURYA KANT, VIKRAM NATH, JJ.
Bishambhar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
M/s Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2963 of 2023, Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 14970 of 2021
WITH
The Rajasthan Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M/s Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2965 of 2023, Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 13106 of 2021
WITH
The State of Rajasthan and Another – Appellants
Versus
M/s Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2964 of 2023, Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 13008 of 2021
WITH
The President, J.K. Staple and Acrylic Employees Union and Others – Appellants
Versus
M/s Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2966 of 2023, Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 960 of 2022
WITH
Rajasthan Trade Union Kendra – Appellant
Versus
M/s Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2967 of 2023, Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 5073 of 2023, Special Leave Petition (c) Diary No. 8380 of 2022
Decided On : 20-04-2023
JUDGMENT :
SURYA KANT, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. This batch of appeals arises from the judgment dated 20.07.2021 passed by the Jaipur Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan whereby the Writ Petition filed by Respondent No. 1-M/s. Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. in all connected matters was allowed. As a corollary, the decision by the Cabinet Committee of the State of Rajasthan, and resulting instructions issued to the Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. (“RIICO”) to cancel a series of permissions and approvals granted/awarded to Respondent No. 1 in respect of industrial land in Kota, Rajasthan, were set aside.
3. There are different Appellants before us in the respective SLPs. They include the State of Rajasthan (hereinafter, “State of Rajasthan” or “State Government”), RIICO and various workers unions (hereinafter “Appellant Unions”). As the nature and type of relief sought by both the State of Rajasthan and RIICO, stand on a slightly different footing to that of the Appellant Unions, we will address the State of Rajasthan and RIICO (collectively, “Appellants”) separately, to maintain the distinction between the reliefs sought by them as compared to the Appellant Unions.
(A) FACTS
4. The dispute originates from the allotment of approximately 271.39 acres of land by the State of Rajasthan through the District Collector, Kota, in the Large-Scale Industrial Area, Kota (“LIA Kota”) to J.K. Synthetics Ltd. (“JKSL”) on 12.09.1958. Following the allotment, a lease deed was executed with JKSL by the Collector, Kota, and permission was granted for setting up its industrial units in the area. JKSL’s retention of the property was facilitated over the following decades through the execution of fresh lease deeds with respect to the same area, as and when the period specified in the earlier lease lapsed.
5. Just after the first allotment was initially made, the State Government exercised its powers under Section 100 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 and formulated the RAJASTHAN INDUSTRIAL AREAS ALLOTMENT RULES , 1959 (“1959 Rules”) to regulate the allocation of land to entrepreneurs and the development of industrial areas across the State. Section 100 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act is provided below:
“100. Sale of land in Industrial and Commercial Areas - The State Government may make rules regulating sales of lands in industrial and commercial areas and may also impose an annual assessment of such lands, wherever necessary.”
6. Similarly, Rules 2, 8 and 9 of the 1959 Rules are also of some relevance and the same are reproduced below:
“2. Period for which land may be allotted - Land in industrial area may be allotted on lease-hold basis for a period of 99 years:
(a) for setting of a large-scale industry anywhere in the state, by the State Government in the Industries Department and in the case of large-scale tourism unit, the allotment shall be made by the Government in the Revenue Department.
(b) for setting up of other industries:
(i) in Jaipur District, by the Director of Industries, Rajasthan Jaipur provided that in case of a tourism unit the allotment shall be made by the Government in the Revenue Department.
(ii) in any other district, by the Collector concerned.
(bb) for the setting up of IT Industries Government land shall be allotted by the State Government in the Revenue Department on the recommendation of the Department of Information Technology and Communication.
(c) all allotment of land under clause (a) shall be made within a period of 60 days and under clause (b) within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the completed application in Form-B. In case applicants submit complete application electronically in Single window System Portal, it shall be disposed as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Enterprises Single Window Enabling and Clearance Rules, 2011.
Provided that the allotment of land for the purpose of setting up of Common Effluent Treatment Plant and related act
AI
The State Government has the power to issue appropriate directions under Article 138 of the Articles of Association of RIICO to manage the affairs of the RIICO, but such power cannot be used to direc....
The court ruled that RIICO lacked authority to deny document release or land use conversion approvals without state government consent, reaffirming that JDA's prior permissions were valid.
The court affirmed that a party cannot use writ jurisdiction to enforce contractual obligations, which must instead be pursued through appropriate civil or arbitration channels.
The court established that rights to mining leases cannot be claimed based on vague representations or unfulfilled promises, especially when a company is declared sick and winding up proceedings are ....
The withdrawal of an allotment must be justified, and reasons for administrative decisions must be valid and consistent. Natural justice principles must be upheld in administrative actions.
The government may resume industrial land for non-utilization by the allottee, with decisions supported by assignment rules and public interest considerations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.