SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2497

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
REKHA BORANA, J.
M/s. Sri Ram Infra Creation Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through Chairman cum Managing Director, Rajasthan State  Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (RIICO) – Respondent 
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15776 OF 2018
Decided On : 21-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Om Prakash Mehta With Mr. Zubin Ahmed
For the Respondent: Mr. Bhavyadeep Singh, Mr. Ayush Goyal For Mr. Vinay Kothari, Mr. Rajat Dave

The court ruled that RIICO lacked authority to deny document release or land use conversion approvals without state government consent, reaffirming that JDA's prior permissions were valid.

Headnote:(A) Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Section 100-A - The petitioner obtained land rights through registered sale-deeds; the prior lessee sought conversion of land use from industrial to residential due to complaints and eventual approval from JDA. RIICO claimed authority over the documentation of the land. Court determined that RIICO lacks jurisdiction to permit land use change without state approval, reinforcing that permissions granted prior to new amendments remain valid. (Paras 12, 21, 29)

(B) Jurisdiction of RIICO - The court noted RIICO's authority to generate changes was not grounded until the amendment was enacted, hence JDA’s earlier permissions were upheld. (Paras 26-28)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner company purchased land previously owned by M/s. Bright Metals. RIICO denied handing over original documents necessary for verification and land use conversion.

Findings of Court:
RIICO was ordered to release original documents to the petitioner within 30 days as the conversion had been authorized per state protocol.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was RIICO's authority over land use changes and the legitimacy of JDA's actions in permitted conversions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that without state government approval, RIICO lacked authority to restrict access to documents or enforce decisions contrary to state permissions. The amendment introduced later was determined as validating actions taken prior. Results: Writ petition allowed; RIICO ordered to return all original documents.

Table of Content
1. background of land purchase and ownership history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. process for land use change request and its implications. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. debate on riico's authority to withhold original documents. (Para 9 , 10)
4. arguments on authority for land use change permissions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. legal precedent regarding authority over land conversion. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. amendment validates riico's actions and authority. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
7. final judgment ordering riico to provide original documents. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)

ORDER :

REKHA BORANA, J.

1. The facts are that the petitioner Company purchased plot No.4 situated in Light Industrial Area, Jodhpur vide a registered sale-deed. Initially the residential (free hold) patta of the land was issued by then Development Department, Government of Marwar on 16.07.1949 to one Abhay Kumar. Subsequently Abhay Kumar surrendered the land in favour of Government of Rajasthan and in lieu thereof a lease deed was issued by State of Rajasthan in favour of M/s. Life Time Product Corporation of which Abhay Kumar was one of the partners. The said lease deed was executed on 23.02.1970 by State of Rajasthan through its competent authority.

2. M/s. Life Time Product Corporation took a loan from Rajasthan Financial Corporation (for short ‘RFC’) and on failure to repay the loan, RFC took possession of the entire mortgaged assets of the company and put it to auction. M/s. Bright Metals Jodhpur being the highest bidder was sold the complete plant and machinery of the company.

3. The present petitioner-Company is purchaser of the land in question from the partners of M/s. Bright Metals Jodhpur.

4. Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Limited (RIICO) was established in year 1979 and the land in question was transferred by State of Rajasthan alongwith other light industrial area to RIICO for maintenance of the said area.

5. However, prior to sale of the land to the petitioner company, M/s Bright Metals Jodhpur applied for conversion of land use from industrial to residential. The same was done as certain complaints were made by the residence of the vicinity qua the noise and chemical pollution arising out of the manufacturing of the steel re- rolling sheets in the premise. Certain directions to the said effect were also issued in one PIL namely Mahendra Lodha vs. State of Rajasthan ; D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6073/1993 and in the overall scenario, the production unit of M/s Bright Metals was closed down. The area in question too became thickly populated and hence, permission for conversion of the land use of the plot in question from industrial to residential was sought by M/s Bright Metals from RIICO. However, the said application stood rejected on the count that there was no policy/rule in the Disposal Rules of RIICO to allow change of land use of the allotted industrial plot for residential purposes

6. In the said event, application dated 30.12.2011 was moved by M/s Bright Metal before the Jodhpur Development Authority (JDA).

7. In pursuance to the said application, after complete process been adopted, the Empowered Committee of JDA, in its meeting dated 13.08.2013, resolved to permit the conversion of land from industrial to residential. In pursuance to the said resolution, complete charges/requisite fee was deposited by the company and even the Gazette Notification of the same was made on 18.09.2013.

8. M/s Bright Metals then requested the competent authority of RIICO to release the original lease deed, sale-deed and the original documents pertaining to the plot in question to it as the same were handed over to RIICO by Indus Ind Bank Ltd. from whom M/s. Bright Metals had taken a loan. The loan was repaid by the firm but the documents remained in possession of RIICO. However, RIICO declined to hand over the said original documents to M/s. Bright Metals and the said inaction is the bone of contention in the present petition.

9. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top