S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Porsche Father in Swap Case
11 Mar 2026
Natural Gas Supplies Prioritized Under Section 3 Essential Commodities Act Amid LNG Disruptions: Central Govt Order
11 Mar 2026
Delhi High Court Directs Ministries, CBFC to Implement Film Accessibility Features for Disabled Persons per RPWD Act Guidelines
11 Mar 2026
Foreign Nationals Entitled to Article 22(1) Grounds of Arrest in Known Language: Karnataka HC Sets at Liberty but Orders Handover to FRRO
11 Mar 2026
Madras HC Permits CBSE Student to Appear for Maths as Additional Subject Despite Policy Violation in Peculiar 'Rat Race' Circumstances
11 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Neha Rathore
11 Mar 2026
Menaka Guruswamy Elected India's First Openly Queer Rajya Sabha MP
11 Mar 2026
ABHAY S. OKA, RAJESH BINDAL
Kashi Nath Singh @ Kallu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
RAJESH BINDAL, J.
1. The appellant was convicted under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IPC’) by the Trial Court and punishment of death penalty along with fine was imposed. As he had been awarded death sentence, the matter was referred to the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi for confirmation. Simultaneously, the appellant also filed appeal challenging his conviction and sentence. Both were heard together. The Division Bench of the High Court while upholding conviction of the appellant, modified the sentence. The death sentence was commuted into life sentence and it was directed that the appellant shall remain in jail for whole of his biological life, without any benefit of remission. Aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court, the appellant has filed the present appeal.
2. The facts of the case, as are evident from the order passed by the High Court, are that a complaint was lodged by informant, Bikash Kumar Mandal (PW-5), brother of the deceased girl (aged abo
Undue leniency in sentencing shakes public confidence in criminal justice system, deterrent effect may not be there – Rights of victim and his family members are also to be considered.
Life sentence – A special category of sentence, instead of death, can be substituted by punishment of imprisonment for life or for a term exceeding 14 years and that category can be put beyond applic....
(1) Kidnapping and rape of girl child – When a sentence of imprisonment for a term not less than 20 years which may extend upto life imprisonment is imposed, convict is also liable to suffer a senten....
Capital punishment can only be imposed in 'rarest of rare' cases, and mitigating factors such as the age of the offender can influence commutation of death sentences.
A victim's testimony alone can support a conviction in sexual assault cases if credible, without the need for corroboration, while considering mitigating circumstances in sentencing.
The court modified the life imprisonment sentence to 18 years for rape, emphasizing the need to consider mitigating circumstances alongside the severity of the crime.
Shiva Kumar alias Shivamurthy v. State of Karnataka
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.