RAJESH BINDAL, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Bhaggi @ Bhagirath @ Naran – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner-convict seeks to assail the judgment dated 11.10.2018 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 5725 of 2018.
2. In troth, it is a common judgment in Criminal Reference No. 6/2018 submitted by the Trial Court under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) for confirmation of the conviction under Section 376 AB of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) as amended by Act No. 22 of 2018 and in Criminal Appeal No. 5725 of 2018 filed by the petitioner-convict herein aggrieved by the conviction and sentence imposed against him for certain other offences under the IPC, as also against the conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short ‘POCSO Act’). As per the impugned judgment, the capital punishment awarded for the conviction under Section 376 AB, IPC was not confirmed and it was commuted to imprisonment for life, which, going by the provisions thereunder, means imprisonment for the remainder of the convict’s natural life.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-convict and the learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Madhya Pradesh.
4. It is to be noted
Bantu alias Naresh Giri vs. State of M.P.
Amrit Singh vs. State of Punjab
Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod vs. State of Gujarat
Shiva Kumar @ Shiva @ Shivamurthy vs. State of Karnataka
Union of India vs. V. Sriharan alias Murugan and Others
Swamy Shraddananda alias Murali Manohar Mishra vs. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.