SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 863

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
RAJIV GUPTA, SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, JJ.
Rajveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P.- Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 4350 of 2005
Decided on : 24-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : K.K. Dwivedi, R.P. Dwivedi
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate, D.N.Wali, Manoj Yadav

IMPORTANT POINT
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and conclusive chain of evidence that excludes all reasonable hypotheses of innocence; mere suspicion is insufficient for conviction.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - MURDER - SECTION 302 IPC, SECTION 27 EVIDENCE ACT - The court discussed the application of Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) concerning murder, emphasizing the necessity of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly in cases based on circumstantial evidence. The court also referenced Section 27 of the Evidence Act regarding the admissibility of evidence obtained through a disclosure statement, highlighting the need for proper procedure in establishing such evidence. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain of evidence linking the accused to the crime, leading to the acquittal of the appellant.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, Rajveer Singh, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his brother, Nem Singh, based on circumstantial evidence and alleged recovery of a weapon and blood-stained clothes. The incident occurred on the night of August 4, 1999, and the FIR was lodged by Surendra Kumar, the son of the deceased, against unknown persons. The prosecution claimed a motive related to property disputes between the appellant and the deceased.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution's case was based solely on circumstantial evidence, which was insufficient to establish the guilt of the appellant beyond a reasonable doubt. The court noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding motive and the recovery of evidence, leading to doubts about the prosecution's claims.

Issues: Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the appellant beyond a reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence and whether the recovery of the weapon and clothes was admissible under the Evidence Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that in cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete chain of evidence that excludes every reasonable hypothesis except that of the accused's guilt. The court emphasized that mere suspicion is not sufficient for conviction and that the prosecution failed to prove the motive and the admissibility of the recovery evidence.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the conviction of the appellant was set aside, and he was acquitted of all charges due to insufficient evidence.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri G.S. Chaturvedi, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Alok Ranjan Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant criminal appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 23.9.2005 passed by the Additional Session Judge, Court No. 11, Agra in S.T. No. 832 of 1999, State Vs. Rajveer Singh and another, arising out of case crime no. 207 of 1999 P.S. Dauki, Agra, under section 302 I.P.C., by which the trial court has convicted the appellant under section 302 I.P.C. and awarded the sentence of life imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs. 25000/-

3. As per the prosecution case as unfurled in the F.I.R. lodged by one Surendra Kumar, P.W.1, vide written report Ex. Ka.1 dated 5.8.1999 which was registered vide case crime no. 207 of 1999 under section 302 I.P.C., P.S. Dauki, District Agra, vide G.D. report, Ex. Ka. 4 prepared by PW.4 at the relevant date and time.

The allegations made in the F.I.R. are that on 4.8.1999 at about 8.30 p.m. in the night his father Nem Singh posted as Kanungo, Sadar, District Agra returned back to his house. After taking his meals at about 10.00 p.m., on account of disruption in the electric supply he slept alone on the Chabutara outside the Baithaka. At about 5.00 a.m., his mother Smt. Jamira Devi came out of the house and saw blood flowing below his cot. Above the cot his father was done to death by some unknown persons by wielding some sharp edged weapon on his neck and face. On the noise raised by his mother and on her wailing he alongwith his other family members reached at the place of incident. On the basis of the said written report scribed by the appellant, Rajveer Singh himself an F.I.R was registered against unknown persons at P.S. Dauki, District Agra.

4. The said F.I.R. was registered in the presence of Station Officer, P.S. Dauki, P.W. 6 Satyaveer Singh who was entrusted with the investigation of the said case. The investigating officer thereafter recorded the statement of the first informant and reached at the place of incident and inspected the place of incident, and prepared the site plan. The Investigating Officer further collected the blood stained earth and plain earth from the place of incident and kept it in a container, sealed it and prepared the recovery memo which has been proved and marked as Ex. Ka. 6 and Ex. Ka. 7. A hair strand was also taken in possession from the right palm of the deceased and its fard recovery memo was prepared and marked as Ex. Ka. 8. A small handkerchief lying near the corpse of the deceased was also taken in possession and its fard recovery memo was prepared and marked as Ex. Ka. 9. The investigating officer had also collected the blood stained string of cot and a blood stained pillow and prepared its recovery memo which has been proved and marked as Ex. Ka. 10 and then recorded the statement of witnesses Phool Singh and Giriraj. Thereafter Station Officer conducted the inquest on the person of the deceased and prepared the inquest memo which has been proved and marked as Ex. Ka. 15. Thereafter the dead body of the deceased was wrapped in a cloth and dispatched for post mortem examination by preparing the seal. An autopsy was conducted on the person of the deceased on 5.8.1999. As per the post mortem report , the victim received six injuries on his person. The injuries noted by the Doctor in the post mortem report are as under.

On internal examination, the central bone of the head was found fractured and membranes were found congested.

5. Thereafter on 5.8.1999, Investigating Officer recorded the statement of Meera Devi wife of the deceased and Geeta, daughter of the deceased. On 16. 8.1999 the appellant, Rajveer Singh was arrested and his statement was recorded and on his pointing out, an axe was recovered from an open place near the Bithoora. Thereafter blood stained Pyjama and Shirt of the appellant was also recovered on the pointing out of the appellant, Rajveer Singh fr

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top