SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(HP) 108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, RAKESH KAINTHLA, JJ.
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondents
Cr. Appeal No. 220 of 2021
Decided on : 22-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Lakshay Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Baldev Negi, Additional

Evidence must establish all circumstances consistent with the accused's guilt, with no reasonable hypothesis of innocence possible, especially in cases of circumstantial evidence.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 302, 382, 201, 452 - Conviction for murder, theft, and wrongful confinement - Appellant convicted for the murder of Kamal Kaur after breaking into her home and stealing her jewelry. The evidence included post-mortem findings, witness testimonies, and DNA analysis linking the accused to the crime scene - Sentence of life imprisonment along with additional prison terms for associated crimes upheld due to the brutal nature of the offense and lack of mitigating circumstances. (Paras 1, 6, 86)

(B) Standard of evidence - In cases based on circumstantial evidence, all circumstances must be established and must consistently point to the guilt of the accused, excluding any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. (Paras 82, 84)

(C) Relying on witness accounts - It is acceptable for prosecution to choose a limited number of witnesses to avoid repetitive testimonies; non-examination of every potential witness is not inherently prejudicial if remaining testimonies are credible. Failure to produce witnesses does not necessarily weaken a strong circumstantial case. (Paras 26, 88)

(D) Discovery in criminal procedure - Confession leading to the discovery of evidence need not always include independent witnesses, particularly when the accused's previous knowledge makes it impractical; the focus should be on obtaining credible evidence within the scope of law. (Paras 55, 70)

Table of Content
1. conviction of the accused under ipc sections (Para 1 , 2)
2. summary of investigation process (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments criticizing the trial court's decision (Para 5 , 7)
4. defense arguments on evidential insufficiencies (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. court analysis of witness statements and evidence (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
6. legal reasoning emphasized on understanding circumstantial evidence in conclusion. (Para 15 , 25)
7. relevance of consistent testimonies by witnesses (Para 17 , 19 , 20)
8. court's reasoning on circumstantial evidence (Para 23 , 24 , 26 , 32)
9. conclusions drawn from recovery of stolen property (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68)
10. ratios established confirming the offenses committed (Para 82 , 86)
11. final judgment affirming the lower court's decision and dismissing the appeal. (Para 87)
12. conclusion upholding trial court's verdict (Para 88 , 89)

JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Kainthla, J.

The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18.06.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Kangra at Dharamshala (learned Trial Court) vide which, the appellant (accused before learned Trial Court) was convicted for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 452 , 302, 382 and 201 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (in short ‘IPC’) and was sentenced as under:

Sr. No.

Section

Sentence

In default

1.

452 of IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for three years and a fine of Rs. 3,000/-

Six months

2.

302 of IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 10,000/-

One year

3.

382 of IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for three years and a fine of Rs. 3,000/-

Six months

4.

201 of IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/-

Six months

(Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the police presented a challan before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 302 , 382, 449 and 201 of IPC. It was asserted that one Deepak informed the police telephonically on 19.04.2017 that Kamal Kaur residing as a tenant near Hanuman Mandir, Niazpur was crying for help and it was found after visiting her home that she was murdered by someone. The information was reduced into writing. An entry No.4 dated 19.04.2017 (Ext. PW22/H) was recorded in the Police Station. Gian Chand Thakur (PW29), HC-Kuldeep Singh (PW27), HHC-Kirpal Singh (PW7), and LC-Babli Devi (PW23), went to the spot to verify the correctness of the information. Sanjay Kumar (PW1) made a statement (Ext.PW1/A) stating that he was residing adjacent to the house of Ashok Kumar. Kamal Kaur, wife of late Praveen Kumar, was residing as a tenant in the house of Ashok Kumar. The informant-Sanjay Kumar went to sleep on 18.04.2017. His aunt-Krishana Devi (PW5) called him on 19.04.2017 at about 4-4:15 am and told him that Kamal Kaur was shouting in her room for help. The informant came out of his home and found that the residents of the area were calling Kamal Kaur. The informant and Vishal Kumar (PW6) went near the gate of Kamal Kaur and found that the gate was locked from inside. The informant and Vishal Kumar climbed up the corner of the house and found that the wire gauze door was shut and the light was switched off. Informant and Vishal opened the door and went inside the room. They switched on the lights and found Kamal Kaur lying dead. The blood was scattered on the bed and floor. Some unknown person had entered the room of Kamal Kaur and murdered her with a sharp-edged weapon. Gian Chand made the endorsement on the statement made by the informant and sent it to the Police Station, where FIR (Ext PW22/J) was registered. Gian Chand conducted the investigation. He prepared the site plan (Ext PW29/A). The photographs (Ext. PW15/A-1 to Ext. PW15/A-10) were taken. A blood-stained knife (Ext. P3)

                                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                    1
                                    2
                                    3
                                    4
                                    5
                                    6
                                    7
                                    8
                                    9
                                    10
                                    11
                                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                    supreme today icon
                                    logo-black

                                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                    Please visit our Training & Support
                                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                    qr

                                    Scan Me!

                                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                    whatsapp-icon Back to top