M. R. SHAH, M. M. SUNDRESH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of civil and criminal appeals (Para 1) |
| 2. background of financial issues in il&fs (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments by union of india regarding misinterpretation (Para 3) |
| 4. counterarguments from bsr (Para 4) |
| 5. court's observations on section 140(5) (Para 5) |
| 6. enforcement of section 140(5) procedures (Para 6) |
| 7. legal framework and audit accountability (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 8. final decisions and orders (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
M.R. Shah, J.
Appeals under consideration:
1. This batch of Criminal Appeals/Civil Appeals raise common question(s) of law pertaining to the interpretation of Section 140(5) of the COMPANIES ACT , 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act, 2013’) and the Investigation Report dated 28.05.2019 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IFIN SFIO Report’) in respect of IL&FS Financial Services Limited (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IFIN’).
1.1 Criminal Appeal Nos. 2305-2307/2022, Criminal Appeal Nos. 2302-2303/2022 and Criminal Appeal No. 2300/2022 have been filed by the Union of India, inter alia, challenging the common judgment and order dated 21.04.2020 passed by the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition Nos. 4144 & 4145 of 2019 and other companion writ petitions
Anirudhsinhji Karansinhji Jadeja v. State of Gujarat
AV Dharma Reddy v. State of A.P. & Ors.
B. Himmatlal Agrawal v Competition Commission of India
Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd & Anr v. UOI
Carona Ltd. v. Parvathy Swaminathan & Sons
Cellular Operators Association of India v. Union of India
Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India
Gokulchand Dwarkadas Morarka v. The King
Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. Chief Minister and Others
K.K Mishra v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Kamal Lochan Sen v. State of Orissa
Madras Bar Association v. Union of India
Mansukhbhai Vithaldas Chauhan v. State of Gujarat
Mohd. Iqbal Ahmed v. State of Andhra Pradesh
NEPC Micon Ltd. v. Magma Leasing Limited
Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu v. Motor & General Traders
Raichurmatham Prabhakar v. Rawatmal Dugar
Sant Lal Gupta v. Modern Cooperative Housing Society Ltd.
Serious Fraud Investigation Office v Rahul Modi
State of Maharashtra v. Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal & Ors. (2022) 2 SCC 725 [Para 4]
Tolaram Relumal v. State of Bombay. (1955) 1 SCR 158 [Para 4]
The formation of an opinion under Section 212(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 must be demonstrably based on established circumstances, failing which the investigation order is invalid.
Financial statements cannot reflect annulled transactions; auditor appointments must comply with statutory protocols to ensure legality and valid corporate governance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.