SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 488

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Abhay S. Oka, Manoj Misra, JJ.
T. Valsan (D) Thr. LRs. & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
K. Kanagaraj & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 3466-3468 of 2023 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.20214-20216/2011)
Decided On : 08-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, AOR Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.r, Adv. Mr. Likhi Chand Bonsle, Adv. Ms. Komal Mundhra, Adv. Mr. Rahat Bansal, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Anurag Dubey, Adv. Ms. Anjali Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Bharadwaj, Adv. Mr. S. R. Setia, AOR Mr. Aravindh S., AOR Ms. Uma Bhuvaneswari.c, Adv. Mr. Abbas, Adv.

IMPORTANT POINT
Promotion – In absence of any statutory provision or rule made thereunder or under proviso appended to Article 309 of Constitution of India, once an incumbent is appointed to post according to rules, their seniority has to be counted from date of appointment.

Headnote:

Service Law – Promotion – To post of Assistant Engineer – In absence of any statutory provision or rule made thereunder or under proviso appended to Article 309 of Constitution of India, once an incumbent is appointed to post according to rules, their seniority has to be counted from date of appointment – There is no distinction between time period served before or after acquisition of degree so long as degree is acquired and is basis for consideration of promotion – Promotion to post of Assistant Engineer was to be based on merit and merit alone – Seniority of candidates could not be taken into account for determining such merit – In this merit based selection, there was a qualifying prescription to be so considered on merits – Time period spent in service as Junior Engineer was at variance dependent on whether person had a qualifying Degree or a qualifying Diploma – There was no necessity for a Degree to perform job of a Junior Engineer, and all persons were alike – Distinction only came into play when merit-based promotion had to take effect – As to when person obtained degree as a method of advancement of his knowledge and entitling him to an earlier consideration in the time period would not be relevant – Appeals dismissed. (Paras 20, 22 and 26)

Facts of the case:

Moot point which arises, is whether, for a Diploma holder, who acquires a degree during the course of employment, the period of service as a Junior Engineer prior to acquiring the degree is to be excluded for computing the eligible period of service for promotion to the post of an Assistant Engineer.

Findings of Court:

Rules have been uniformly implemented in the Electricity Department over a period of time. In that view, due weightage must be given to the view of the framers of Rules.

Result : Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The Appellants herein joined the service as Junior Engineers in the Electricity Department of the Government of Puducherry, having already acquired an Engineering Degree prior to the appointment to the post of Junior Engineer. On the other hand, the private Respondents joined the service as Junior Engineers with a Diploma and, in the course of service, obtained an Engineering Degree.

Factual Background:

3. As per the Government of Pondicherry, Electricity Department, Group B (Technical) Assistant Engineer (Electrical) Recruitment Rules, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’) for the post of Junior Engineer, 50% of the vacancies are to be filled by promotion, and the remaining 50% are to be filled by direct recruitment. The next avenue of promotion is to the post of Assistant Engineer (Electrical).

4. Under the said Rules, 80% of the vacancies for the post of Assistant Engineer are to be filled up by ‘promotion’ and 20% by ‘direct recruitment’. The promotion is made among Junior Engineers with three years of regular service for those with a Degree in electrical engineering and seven years of regular service for those with only a Diploma in electrical engineering. A subsequent amendment dated 07.10.1982 was made to Rule 4 read with Paragraph 11 of the Recruitment Rules on the subject of ‘promotion’. Thereafter, the amended Rules earmarked 50% for those Junior Engineers who possess Degree in Engineering with regular service of 3 years. The other 50% was earmarked for those Junior Engineers who possess Diploma with regular service of 7 years.

Promotion to the post of Assistant Engineers

1. 20% by Direct Recruitment with degree as qualification

2. 80% by Promotion. Out of this 80%,

a. 50% for Junior Engineer with 3 years regular service in the grade and possessing an Engineering Degree and

b. 50% for Junior Engineer with 7 years regular service in the grade and possessing a Diploma in Electrical Engineering.

Recruitment for Junior Engineers:

1. 50% by promotion

2. Remaining 50% through direct recruitment

Desirable qualification for direct recruits:

Degree in Electrical & Electronics Engineering

Essential Qualification:

Diploma in Electrical and Electronics with three years’ experience

5. Significance of the aforesaid is that in order to earn their promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer, a Junior Engineer, possessing an Engineering Degree, has to have fewer years of service while in the case of a Diploma holder, the requisite period for service, to be eligible for promotion, was more. We may notice that while working as a Junior Engineer, there is no difference between a Degree holder and a Diploma holder. The moot point, thus, which arises, is whether, for a Diploma holder, who acquires a degree during the course of employment, the period of service as a Junior Engineer prior to acquiring the degree is to be excluded for computing the eligible period of service for promotion to the post of an Assistant Engineer.

6. The Puducherry administration construed the Rules to mean that as long as the Diploma holder acquires a degree, the period spent in service as a Junior Engineer, before the acquisition of an engineering degree, would be counted. The Appellants, thus, approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench (hereinafter referred to as ‘the CAT’) in O.A. No. 355/2008, challenging the decision of the Puducherry administration to promote the Junior Engineers, who were originally Diploma holders and acquired degree during service, as Assistant Engineers under the Degree quota, immediately after they acquired their degree without insisting on a three-years of continuous service from the date of acquisition of the degree. Thi


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top