SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 506

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMAR
Indiabulls Asset Reconstruction Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kishore Arora – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Shashwat Singh, Adv. Ms. Geetika Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sumesh Dhawan, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. Angad Varma, Adv. Mr. Toyesh Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Mehndiratta, Adv. M/s. Dua Associates, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Siddharth Bhatli, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, AOR Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Adv. Ms. Khyati Jain, Adv. Mr. Ishaan Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Nakul Dewan, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, AOR Mr. Somdutta Bhattacharyya, Adv. Ms. Niharika Sharma, Adv. Ms. Kiran Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sathvik Chandrasekar, Adv. Mr. R Sudhinder, Adv. Mr. R Gopalakrishnan, Adv. Mr. Viplan Acharya, Adv. Mr. N. B. V. Srinivasa Reddy, Adv. Mr. Akshat Srivastava, AOR Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh, AOR Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, AOR Mr. M. L. Lahoty, Adv. Mr. Paban Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Anchit Sripat, Adv. Mr. Pranab Kumar Nayak, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv. Mr. Nishant Verma, AOR Ms. Shisba Chawla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Apoorv Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Jogy Scaria, AOR Mr. Somesh Dhawan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Ms. Geetika Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shivam Shukla, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR

JUDGMENT :

Civil Appeal No. 5941 of 2022 and Civil Appeal No. 1925 of 2023

1. These two appeals (Civil Appeal Nos. 5941 of 2022 and 1925 of 2023) filed by the Union Bank of India and Indiabulls Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. respectively, being the financial creditors of the corporate debtor – Supertech Ltd., are directed against the order dated 10.06.2022 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, Hereinafter referred to as ‘the Appellate Tribunal’ or ‘NCLAT’, in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 406 of 2022. By the order impugned, the Appellate Tribunal, while dealing with an appeal against the order dated 25.03.2022 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi – Court VI, Hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’ or ‘NCLT’, in admitting an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Hereinafter referred to as ‘IBC’ or ‘the Code’, has issued a slew of directions which practically have the effect of converting the corporate insolvency resolution process, For short, ‘CIRP’, in question into a “project-wise insolvency resolution process” inasmuch as the constitution of committee of creditors, For short, ‘

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top