M. R. SHAH, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Ravikumar Dhansukhlal Maheta – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. Shah, J.
1. By way of this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the writ petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order to declare the Select List dated 10.03.2023 issued by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad for the promotion of Senior Civil Judges to the Cadre of District Judge (65% quota) as being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as well as Rule 5 of the Gujarat State Judicial Service Rules, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “Rules, 2005”) as well as the Recruitment Notice – District Judge (65%) dated 12.04.2022.
2. The facts leading to the present writ petition in nutshell are as under:-
2.1 That this Court in the case of All India Judges’ Association and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors., (2002) 4 SCC 247, had directed that the recruitment to the Higher Judicial Services, i.e., the cadre of District Judges will be on the basis of principle of “merit-cum-seniority” and passing a suitability test. This Court also further directed that the appropriate Rules shall be framed as above by the respective
All India Judges’ Association and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
B.V. Sivaiah and Ors. Vs. K. Addanki Babu and Ors.
State of Kerala and Anr. Vs. N. M. Thomas and Ors.
Shriram Tomar and Anr. Vs. Praveen Kumar Jaggi and Ors.
C.P. Kalra Vs Air India (1994) Supp1 SCC 454 – Referred [Para 4.4]
Hemani Malhotra Vs. High Court of Delhi
V.K. Srivastava and Ors. Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
Rajendra Kumar Srivastava and Ors. Vs. Samyut Kshetriya Gramin Bank and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.