SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 2391

ARUN MISHRA, S. ABDUL NAZEER, M. R. SHAH
Omkar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. R. Venkataramani, Mr. Dinesh Dwivedi, Mr. V. Shekhar, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Mr. Robin Khokhar, Mr. R. Venkataramani, Mr. Robin Khokhar, Mr. Yash Raj Bundela, Mr. Praveen Vignesh, Mr. R. Venkataramani, Mr. Robin Khokhar, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Ms. Japneet Kaur, Ms. Vriti Gujral, Ms. Pallavi Singh, Mr. Anzu. K. Varkey, Mr. Nidesh Gupta, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mrs. Neeraj Singh, Ms. Harshita Raghuvanshi, Mr. K. Ramesh, Anzu K. Varkey, Mr. Rupender Singh Suri, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mr. Aditya Giri, Mr. Vikas Singh, Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna, Ms. Roopali Chaturvedi, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Mr. Shyam Divan, Mr. Prashant Shukla, Mr. Suyash Srivastava, Ms. Nikita Capoor, Ms. Shreya Mishra, Mr. Ravindra Sadanand Chingale, Mrs. V. Mohana, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mrs. Neeraj Singh, Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Ms. Ritu Reniwal, Mr. Rohit Singh, Mr. P.V. Surendranath, Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran, Ms. Lekha Sudhakaran, Mrs. Kiran Suri, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mr. Ved Prakash, Mr. Sanjay Rastogi, Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Ms. Roopali Chaturvedi, Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Dwivedi, Dr. Vinod Kr. Tewari, Mr. Ajay K. Mishra, Mr. Rajesh K. Singh, Mr. Krishnanand Pandeya, Ms. Pooja, Mr. Ravi S. Jha, Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Mr. Mukesh Verma, Mr. Sanjeet Paliwal, Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, Mr. Niranjan Sahu, Mr. Raj Singh Rana, Ms. Parul Shukla, Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Mr. Virendra Kasana, Mr. Vijay Pratap Yadav, Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mrs. Neeraj Singh, Ms. Ritu Reniwal, Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, Mr. R.K. Singh, Ms. Ritu Reniwal, Mr. Prithvi Raj Singh, Ms. Sheetal Rajput, Mr. Robin Khokhar, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mrs. Neeraj Singh, Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Ms. Ritu Reniwal, Mr. Robin Khokhar, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mr. Sushil Kumar, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Mrs. Prachi Bhatnagar, Mr. Balraj Dewan, Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, Mr. Devvrat, Mr. R.K. Singh, Ms. Priyanka Das, Mr. Tom Joseph, Mr. U.C. Mohanty, Mr. Binay Kumar Das, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mr. P. Dayal, Mrs. Neeraj Singh, Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Ms. Shalu Sharma, Mr. Anand Nandan, Ms. Shalu Sharma, Ms. Parul Shukla, Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Mr. Abbula Kalam, Mr. Abdul Qadir, Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, Mr. Manoj K. Mishra, Ms. Roopali Chaturvedi, Mr. Rakesh Uttamchandra Upadhyay, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mrs. Neeraj Singh, Mr. Shafiq Khan, Ms. Nidhi Singh Dubey, Mr. Sanjay Rastogi, Mr. Dhruv Gautam, Mr. Devashish Chauhan, Ms. Pallavi Mishra, Ms. Neha Agarwal, Ms. Charu Ambwani, Mr. Nishesh Sharma, Mr. Durga Dutt, Mr. Rohit Priyadarshi, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mrs. Neeraj Singh, Mr. Rahul Kumar Tripathi, Ms. Ritu Reniwal, Mr. Parminder Singh Bhullar, Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Swastik Dalai, Dr. Vinod Kumar Tewari, Mr. R.K. Singh, Mrs. Neeraj Singh, Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Ms. Ritu Reniwal, Mr. A. Lakshminarayanan, Ms. Manju Jetley, Mr. Amit Pawan, Ms. Garima Prashad, Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, Ms. Parul Shukla, Mr. Rakesh Mishra, Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Rajeev K. Gupta, Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Ms. Charu Ambwani, Mr. Puskar Sharma, Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, Mr. Susheel Tomar, Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, Mr. Nishit Agrawal, Mr. Harsh Mishra, Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, Ms. Khushboo Vinodray Malkan, Mr. Alok Singh, Mr. Narayan R. Panicker, Dr. Amarendra P. Yadav, Mr. Abhishek Singh, Ms. Manju Sharma Jaitley.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted. Applications for impleadment are allowed to the extent of intervention.

2. All these appeals have been preferred against the impugned common judgment and final order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad on 30.05.2018 in Special Appeal NO.506/2018 deciding the bunch of the matters.

3. The singular question involved is whether the incumbents who were pursuing any of the Teachers Training Course (for short ‘TTC’) (recognized by the National Council for Teachers Education (for short ‘NCTE’) or the Rehabilitation Council of India (for short ‘RCI’) as the case may be) could have appeared in the Teachers Eligibility Test (for short ‘TET’) prescribed by the NCTE?

4. The basic education is defined under Section 2(1)(b) of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act, 1972 (for short "Act of 1972") to mean education up to class VIII imparted in schools other than high schools or intermediate colleges. Section 19 of the Act of 1972 provides for rulemaking power of the State Government and envisages that the State Government by notification may make rules for carrying out purposes of the Act. The Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rule

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top