B. V. NAGARATHNA, UJJAL BHUYAN
NHPC Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of act of 1955 and amendments (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments by appellants challenging the amendments (Para 4) |
| 3. interpretation of legislative competence (Para 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 4. analysis of legislative changes and judicial precedents (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. legislative competence and legislative intent clarified (Para 15 , 19 , 21) |
| 6. affirmation of the act and its applicability (Para 23 , 26) |
| 7. final order of the court dismissing appeals (Para 27) |
NAGARATHNA, J.
Bird’s eye view of the controversy:
2.1. These appeals also call for consideration of ancillary arguments in the matter such as legislative competence of the Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly to enact the Act of 1955 and the Amendment and Validation Act of 1997, which are stated to be enacted on the strength of Article 246, read with Entry 56 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India.
Brief facts of the case:
3.1. The facts in a nutshell are that the Act of 1955 was enacted by the Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly with a view to levy tax on passengers and goods carri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.