SANJIV KHANNA, ARAVIND KUMAR
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Chiranjilal (Mineral) Industries of Bagandih – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of mining lease applications and history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. overview of legal arguments presented by parties. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. analysis on statutory provisions affecting mining lease. (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. final ruling on execution of mining lease. (Para 22) |
JUDGMENT :
This appeal, by way of special leave, takes exception to the judgment of the division bench of the High Court of Calcutta, whereby the intra-court appeal preferred by the State of West Bengal and Others in F.M.A. No. 1458 of 2017 with CAN No. 6596 of 2017 has been dismissed with the direction to the Appellant No. 2 – Joint Secretary, Department of Industries, Commerce and Enterprises, West Bengal or any authorised officer to execute a mining lease in favour of the Respondent No. 2 – Dinesh Agarwal, sole proprietor of Respondent No. 1 - M/s. Chiranjilal (Mineral) Industries of Bagandih.
2.1. On 06.03.1998, Respondent No. 1 - M/s. Chiranjilal (Mineral) Industries of Bagandih. had filed an application before the Mining Officer-in-charge, Purulia Zone, Directorate of Mines and Minerals, West Bengal, for the grant of a mining lease for the purpose of extracting Dolomite at Mouza - Khar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.