S. RAVINDRA BHAT, ARAVIND KUMAR
Religare Finvest Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. These appeals1 [Crl. Appeal No. 2242/2023 and Crl. Appeal No. 2243/2023] arise from a final order2 [Dated 24.3.2023 in Crl. M.C. No. 3173 of 2021] of the Delhi High Court rejecting a petition for quashing criminal proceedings, filed by the DBS Bank India Limited (second respondent in the first appeal/appellant in second the appeal) (hereafter “DBS”). In the two appeals, Religare Finvest Limited (hereafter “complainant” or “RFL”) and DBS have challenged the impugned order. To be more specific, they are also impleaded as second respondents in each other’s appeal.
2. RFL filed a commercial suit3 [Comm. No. 940/2018] seeking to recover Rs. 791 Crores from (the erstwhile) Laxmi Vilas Bank (hereafter “LVB”). The claim was based on the allegations that LVB misappropriated Fixed Deposits (“FDs”) furnished as security by RFL and its group companies, namely RHC Holding Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter “RHC Holding”) and Ranchem Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter “Ranchem”) to secure short-term loans.
3. Subsequently, on 23.9.2019, RFL lodged a criminal complaint asserting that officials of LVB had conspired with RHC Holding and Ranchem. This led to the registration of FIR4 [FIR No. 189/
Sham Sunder & Others v. State of Haryana
Nicholas Piramal India Limited v. S. Sundaranayagam, Rendered on August 23, 2007
M. Abbas Haji v. T. N. Channakeshava
Esso Standard Inc. vs. Udharam Bhagwandas Japanwalla
Iridium India Telecom vs. Motorola Inc.
Standard Chartered Bank vs. Directorate of Enforcement
M/s. General Radio and Appliances Co. Ltd. vs. M.A. Khader (Dead) by LRs.
Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. vs. CIT, Haryana, H.P. and Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.