Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
Centre For Public Interest Litigation – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER
I.A. NO. 45646/2022 IN. CONMT.PET.(C) 403/2021
1. Mr Naresh Kaushik, counsel appearing on behalf of the UPSC, states that on 30 November 2022, UPSC has issued a communication to the State of Jharkhand adverting to certain defects which were found in the proposal for recommending officers for the post of DGP.
2. We direct the State of Jharkhand to attend to the requisitions which have been furnished by UPSC and to positively submit its reply on or before 23 December 2022.
3. UPSC shall thereafter take consequential action no later than 9 January 2023.
4. List the IA on 16 January 2023.
W.P.(C) No. 1375/2021
1. Mr Naresh Kaushik, counsel appearing on behalf of UPSC, states that UPSC has prepared a panel for appointment of the DGP in the State of Bihar.
2. The panel which has been formulated by UPSC shall be communicated no later than by 19 December 2022, having due regard to the fact that the term of the incumbent is to expire on 19 December 2022.
3. The State of B
Timely addressing of requisitions and taking consequential actions is crucial in the process of appointing officers for key positions.
A candidate must meet the established criteria and cut-off marks to be considered for appointment, and vacancies cannot provide an indefeasible right to appointment when the selection process is comp....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when an alternative forum, such as the Central Administrative Tribunal, is available for redressal of grievances, the High Court may not enter....
The selected candidates did not have an absolute right to appointment, and the life of the panel remains valid for one year from the date of publication of the merit list.
Promotion to selection posts must be based on merit rather than seniority; the government is not obliged to promote an officer if deemed unsuitable.
Promotions in the Arunachal Pradesh Police Service take effect from the date of the promotion order, not from the date a vacancy arises, as per the Arunachal Pradesh Police Service Rules, 1989.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article