SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1847

SURYA KANT, J. K. MAHESHWARI
B. R. K. Aathithan – Appellant
Versus
Sun Group – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, Advocate, Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate, Mr. Y. Lokesh, Advocate, Mr. V. Sibi Kargil,Advocate, Mr. V. Kandha Prabhu, Advocate, Mr. L.R. Venkatesan, Advocate, Ms. Maitri Goal, Advocate, Ms. Priyanka Chowdhary, Advocate, Mr. Hemant Kumar Niranjan, Advocate, Mr. K.K. Chauhan, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Advocate, Ms. Liz Mathew, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Buch, Advocate, Ms. Vasudha Jain, Advocate, Mr. Satyanarayan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. K.V. Jagdishwaran, Advocate, Ms. G. Indira, Advocate, Mr. Harnaman Singh, Advocate, Mr. P. Gandeepan, Advocate, Mrs. Koj Yaayung, Advocate, Mr. Kashyap, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Surya Kant, J. - Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. The appellant assails the Judgment and Order dated 30-08-2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, Madurai Bench, whereby the High Court allowed the petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, `the Cr.P.C.') filed by the respondents and quashed the Criminal Complaint viz. STC No.45 of 2017, filed under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code, which the appellant had filed against the respondents.

4. Briefly stated, the facts are that First Information Report No.345 of 2013 was registered against the appellant under Section 468 IPC before Tirucher Taluk Police, Tutukodi District at the instant of an Advocate who alleged that the appellant had taken huge amounts of money by assuring admission to candidates in various law colleges.

5. The factum of registration of the FIR and arrest of the appellant in that case was tele-casted and published in the TV and print media by the respondents.

6. The appellant having felt that the action of the respondents amounted to criminal defamation, filed a Criminal Complaint under Sections 499 and 500 IPC etc. which was, however, dismissed b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top