SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1876

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Surya Kant, J.B. Pardiwala, JJ.
A. Prakash – Appellant
Versus
The Claims Manager M/s Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 7410-7411 of 2022 (@Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 293294 of 2021)
Decided On : 17-10-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Dr. Ram Sankar, Advocate, Mr. H. Chandra Sekhar, Advocate, Ms. Rekha Chandrasekhar, Advocate, Mr. A. Vasantha Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Sujatha Bagadhi, Advocate, Ms. R.V. Shaarumathi, Advocate, Mr. G. Jai Singh, Advocate, Ms. Divya, Advocate, Mr. Yusuf, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Shivam Singh, Advocate, Mr. Gopal Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent.

The court emphasized the importance of relying on medical evidence to determine the extent of permanent disability and the justness of compensation in motor accident claims.

Headnote:

Permanent Disability - Motor Accident Claims - Medical Certificate, Disability Certificate - Rs.6,39,600/- - Rs.2,58,000/- - Rs.6500/- - Rs.3000/- - 7.5% p.a.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant challenged the High Court's order reducing the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal due to a car accident resulting in multiple injuries.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court erred in not appreciating the evidence on record, and the Medical Certificate and Disability Certificate clearly indicated 60% permanent disability. The notional income fixed by the Tribunal was just, fair, and equitable.

Issues: Reduction of compensation based on notional income and permanent disability assessment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Medical Certificate and Disability Certificate to establish the extent of permanent disability and the justness of the notional income fixed by the Tribunal.

Final Decision: The appeals were allowed, the High Court's order was set aside, and the Tribunal's award was restored. The Insurance Company was directed to make the payment of the awarded amount along with interest.

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant - claimant has challenged the Order dated 17-03-2020 passed by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, whereby the Award of Rs.6,39,600/- granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (in short, the 'Tribunal) has been reduced to Rs.2,58,000/-.

3. The appellant was traveling in a four-wheeler bearing Registration No.TN-58-U-1478, when the said car dashed against a coconut tree on the Kollam-Thirumangalam Road in Sivarampettiai Curved Road and a result thereto, the appellant sustained multiple injuries in his left rib bones, blood clotting in lungs and lacerated injuries in the back side of the head, forehead and back side.

4. The appellant filed a Claim Petition for award of compensation of Rs.25,00,000/-, which was accepted in part by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, holding that the appellant had suffered 60% permanent disability and awarded a sum of Rs.6,39,600/- as compensation.

5. The High Court, has vide impugned Order, though accepted that as per the Medical Board, the appellant has suffered 60% permanent disability, but it has proceeded to reduce the compensation on the premise that there is no evidence to show that there is a total permanent disability and the claimant is not able to do any work. The High Court has thus reduced the notional income of the appellant from Rs.6500/- to Rs.3000/- per month.

6. Having heard learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the parties and after carefully perusing the material available on record, we are satisfied that the High Court fell in error in not appreciating the evidence on record. The Medical Certificate, including the Discharge Summary issued by the Tirunelveli Government Medical College Hospital (Exhibit 'P7'), as also the Disability Certificate (Exhibit 'P15') clearly point out that the appellant has suffered 60% permanent disability. In absence of any evidence to the contrary, there was no reason for the High Court not to rely upon these Certificates and proceed on mere surmises and conjectures. It goes without saying that if the appellant is held to have suffered 60% permanent disability, the notional income of Rs.6500/- per month fixed by the Tribunal is just, fair and equitable.

7. For the reasons aforesaid, the appeals are allowed; the impugned Judgment and Order dated 17-03-2020 passed by the High Court is set aside and the Award dated 09-05-2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal is restored.

8. The Respondent No.1 - Insurance Company is directed to make payment of the awarded amount of Rs.6,39,600/- along with interest @ 7.5% p.a. as directed by the Tribunal, within a period of six weeks from today.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top