SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.Y. Chandrachud, Sanjiv Khanna, Surya Kant, JJ.
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra Giri – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No 647 of 2022; (Arising Out of SLP (Crl) No 1164 of 2022) with Criminal Appeal No 648 of 2022; (Arising Out of SLP (Crl) No 3439 of 2022)
Decided On : 19-04-2022
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 - Section 37 - The court found that the impugned order of the High Court of Jharkhand did not consider the statutory mandate of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the respondents to surrender within seven days. The bail applications are restored to the file of the High Court for fresh decision without being influenced by the impugned order. The court did not express any opinion on the merits of the bail applications.
Fact of the Case:
The court sets aside the impugned order of the High Court of Jharkhand and directs the respondents to surrender within seven days. If they fail to do so, the Investigating Officer will take necessary steps to detain and arrest them. The bail applications are restored to the file of the High Court for fresh decision without being influenced by the impugned order. The court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the bail applications.
Finding of the Court:
The impugned order is unsustainable as it does not consider the statutory mandate of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court sets aside the impugned order and directs the respondents to surrender within seven days. The bail applications are restored to the file of the High Court for fresh decision without being influenced by the impugned order.
Result: The appeals are allowed in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. Arising out of the same FIR, Criminal Appeal No 46 of 2022 was allowed by an order dated 7 January 2022 passed by this Court [Narcotics Control Bureau vs Ajeet Kumar Yadav]. The order of the Court is reproduced below for convenience of reference:
'Leave granted.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
The impugned order is unsustainable as does not take into consideration the statutory mandate of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act 1985 (for short, 'NDPS Act').
In view of the aforesaid position, the impugned order is set aside and the respondent is directed to surrender within a period of seven days. If the respondent does not surrender within the aforesaid time, the investigation officer would take immediate and necessary steps to detain and arrest the respondent.
We also restore B.A. No. 3081 of 2021 to the file of the High Court with a direction to decide the bail application afresh in accordance with law and without being influenced by the impugned order. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits. It will be open to the respondent to move an application for early listing of bail application after the respondent surrenders.
The appeal is partly allowed, setting aside the impugned order on the aforesaid terms with direction of a fresh decision.
All pending applications stand disposed of.'
3. The Single Judge of the High Court of Jharkhand has allowed the applications for bail without even adverting to the provisions of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985.
4. The Office Report indicates that the respondents have been served.
5. Following the directions which were issued on 7 January 2022 in Criminal Appeal No 46 of 2022, we pass the following order:
(i) The impugned orders of the High Court of Jharkhand dated 26 July 2021 in Bail Application No 6238 of 2021 and 23 June 2021 in Bail Application No 4881 of 2021 are set aside;
(ii) The respondents are directed to surrender within a period of seven days and, if they fail to do so within the stipulated period, the Investigating Officer would take immediate and necessary steps to detain and arrest the respondents;
(iii) Bail Application Nos 6238 of 2021 and 4881 of 2021 are restored to the file of the High Court with a direction to decide the applications afresh without being influenced by the impugned order; and
(iv) This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the bail applications and it will be open to the respondents to move an application for early listing after they surrender.
6 The appeals are allowed in the above terms.
7 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
The impugned order is unsustainable as it does not consider the statutory mandate of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Grant of bail – An undeserving bail granted to a habitual drug offender can be cancelled.
Bail granted due to lack of criminal antecedents and prolonged incarceration.
(1) Grant of bail – Satisfaction with conditions laid down under Section 37 of NDPS Act is mandatory while entertaining prayer for bail involving commercial quantity of narcotic drugs.(2) Justice Dis....
Grant of bail – While considering application for bail made by accused involved in offence under NDPS Act liberal approach ignoring mandate under Section 37 of NDPS Act is impermissible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS act, 1985 are crucial in determining the grant of bail in cases involving commercial quantity of narc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.