D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA
Totaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. By the impugned order dated 2 December 2022, a Single Judge of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh cancelled the bail which was granted to the appellant. The High Court observed that the Trial Court had granted bail to the appellant without taking into account an earlier order of the High Court dated 21 July 2022 rejecting bail. The High Court observed that the mere fact that the charge-sheet had been filed could not be considered as a change in circumstances. The police was directed to arrest the appellant immediately. The High Court has also directed the Registrar General to issue a notice to show cause to the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Harda to seek his explanation on the circumstances in which he had granted bail to the appellant.
3. The appellant and the complainant are closely related.
4. On 19 June 2022, FIR No 354 was registered against the appellant at Police Station Harda, District Harda. The FIR implicates alleged offences under Sections 294, 323, 342, 354 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.
5. The allegation in the FIR is that on 19 June 2022 when the complainant was going to tend his cows and oxen, the appellant and oth
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.