Back
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J. B. PARDIWALA
Christian Michel James – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
ORDER
1. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner relied on the provisions of Section 436A of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ['CrPC'] in aid of the submission that the petitioner has completed half of the maximum sentence and is, therefore, entitled to bail.
2. We are not inclined to accept the submission of the petitioner. The extradition decree in Dubai, on which the petitioner places reliance, provides as follows:
'Whereas the case is related to the extradition of Christian James Michael, British citizen, to the Indian authorities on charge of "misuse of occupation or position, money laundering, collusion, fraud, misappropriation and offering illegal gratification". Whereas the merits of the extradition request are briefed in that the Indian authorities requested the UAE to extradite Christian James Michael, British citizen, on charge of misuse of position or job, money laundering, collusion, fraud, misappropriation and offering illegal gratification within the territory of the requesting country. An arrest warrant was issued by the court in the requesting state.' (emphasis supplied)
3. The purport of the decree is to cover several offences which have been highlighted abov
The applicability of Section 436A for bail is determined by the nature and severity of alleged offences under relevant laws.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of Section 436A CrPC and the principle that 'bail is the rule and jail is an exception', emphasizing the right to liberty and ....
The statutory right given to the accused under Section 437(6) of Cr.P.C. cannot be taken away based solely on previous criminal antecedents.
Extradition Treaty - Restrictions on surrender - Request of the Petitioner- accused, for an expedited surrender and extradition, cannot be allowed, until the Petitioner continues to be an accused in ....
Extradition cannot proceed under the Extradition Act if the accused faces pending charges in India, as mere bail does not constitute discharge.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of Section 24 of The Extradition Act, 1962 must be read along with Section 31, and the entitlement to discharge under Section 2....
The exclusion of Section 438 of the CrPC to offences punishable under the UAP Act is absolute. An application for anticipatory bail is not maintainable in respect of offences punishable under the UAP....
Bail conditions for foreign nationals must respect personal liberty under Article 21 and cannot lead to indefinite detention without legal backing.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
