IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, C.S.SUDHA
Ahammedkutty Pothiyil Thottiparambil S/o Late Mohammed @ Bappu Haji – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Rep. by the National Investigation Agency – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
1. The moot question in this case is whether the exclusion of the application of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code) to the offences punishable under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 contained in Section 43D(4) of the said Statute, is absolute.
2. The appellant is accused No. 20 in R.C. No. 2/2020/NIA, a crime registered under Sections 16, 17 and 18 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (the UAP Act). The appellant challenges in this appeal, the order dismissing the application preferred by him before the Special Court for Trial of NIA Cases (the Special Court) seeking anticipatory bail in the said case.
3. On 5.7.2020, 30.244 kg of 24 karat gold valued 14.82 crores was seized from an import cargo addressed to the Consulate General of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in Thiruvananthapuram at the Air Cargo Complex of the Thiruvananthapuram International Airport by Customs (Preventive) Commissionerate, Cochin. It is seen that based on information that the proceeds of the smuggled gold could be used for financing terrorism in India, the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India directed the National Investig
Anand Teltumbde vs. State of Maharashtra
Chidambaram P. vs. Directorate of Enforcement
Mohammed Shafi vs. National Investigation Agency
Prathvi Raj Chauhan vs. Union of India
State of M.P. vs. Ram Kishna Balothia
Subhash Kashinath Mahajan vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.