VIKRAM NATH, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kumaon Entertainment and Hospitalities Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIKRAM NATH, J.
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.07.2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in Writ Appeal No. 175 of 2017 titled “Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. vs. Kumaon Entertainment and Hospitalities Private Limited” whereby the appeal of the appellant was dismissed, thereby confirming the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 03.09.2015 and 14.11.2016, allowing the Writ Petition No. 1605 of 2015 of the respondent and dismissing the review petition respectively.
2. The State of Karnataka came up with a policy decision for the purposes of promoting and developing industries related to Electronic and Information Technology within the State. It established Karnataka State Electronic Development Corporation Ltd. 1 [in short known as “appellant”] as a Non-Profit Organisation for the aforesaid purpose across the State including the Electronic City in Bangalore. Acquisition of land in large amount was made in Bangalore city for setting up an area known as Electronic City.
3. The appellant, vide its 133rd Board Resolution came up with a new selection process for allotment of land in the El
Union of India vs. West Coast Paper Mill
M. Nagabhushana v. State of Karnataka, (2011) 3 SCC 408 [Paras 12, 13, 16
Dnyandeo Sabaji Naik v. Pradnya Prakash Khadekar
Vinod Kapoor v. State of Goa, (2012) 12 SCC 378, [Paras 11 to 13
Sandhya Educational Society v. Union of India, (2014) 7 SCC 701 [Paras 13
Neeraj Jhanji v. Commr. Of Customs & Central Excise, (2015) 12 SCC 695, [Paras 2-3
Limitation – Delay can be condoned in order to advance justice inter se parties.
The court upheld the legality of increased land costs under the Relocation of Industries Scheme, emphasizing the consequences of delay and the contractual obligation to comply with revised pricing te....
Petitioners cannot assert rights for land allotments when their claims are contingent on another party's pending applications, especially after such approvals have expired.
Non-compliance with payment schedules in allotment agreements leads to automatic cancellation of rights to the property.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.