SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Surjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background on industrial land allotment process (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. timeline and notifications regarding payment obligations (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. appellant's legal arguments against revised costs (Para 15 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. court's reasoning on payment obligations and interest (Para 16 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. final ruling dismissing the appeal (Para 24)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. The present LPA arises out of the Impugned Order dated 12.10.2020 passed by the Ld. Single Judge in W.P. (C) 7748/2020.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the instant LPA are that the Appellant is the proprietor of M/s Surjeet Printers, established in 1989 at the address 7K, Kolhapur Road, Delhi. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1996 had issued directions to relocate industries in non-conforming and residential areas to areas earmarked for industrial purposes. For the purpose of allotting new land, the industrial areas were earmarked for development including Bawana-II (Bhorgarh)

3. In compliance with the aforesaid directions, Respondent No.1/Government of NCT of Delhi through the Department of Industries floated the Scheme of Relocation of Industries (herei

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top