A. S. BOPANNA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Kalyani Rajan – Appellant
Versus
Indraprastha Apollo Hospital – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.
The present appeal is directed against the order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1[(for short, ‘the Commission’)] dated 03.08.2010 whereby the complaint filed by the appellant and proforma respondent No. 3 under Section 2 (c)(iii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 19862[(for short, ‘the Act’)] was rejected.
2. The complainant-appellant is the wife of the deceased patient namely, Sankar Rajan3[(for short, ‘the deceased’)], who was 37 years old and died on 06.11.1998 in the hospital-respondent no. 1 herein while undergoing follow up care and treatment after a major neurosurgery in the care of respondent nos. 1 and 2. The deceased was under the employment of proforma respondent no. 3 and was earning handsome annual package at the time of his demise.
3. The deceased was suffering from Chiari Malformations (Type II) with Hydrocephalous. The deceased consulted Dr. Ravi Bhatia – respondent no. 2, Senior Consultant, Department of Neurosurgery of respondent no. 1-hospital on 21.10.1998, who advised him to get admitted to respondent no. 1-hospital where the surgery would be performed by him. As per the advice of respondent no. 2, th
Martin F. D’Souza v. Mohd. Ishfaq
Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Centre v. Asha Jaiswal and Others
Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab and Another
Martin F. D'Souza v. Mohd. Ishfaq(2009) 3 SCC 1 [Para 28] – Relied.
C.P. Sreekumar (Dr.), MS (Ortho) v. S. Ramanujam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.