VIKRAM NATH, RAJESH BINDAL
Munishamappa – Appellant
Versus
M. Rama Reddy – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This appeal assails the correctness of the judgment and order dated 10.11.2010, passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, whereby the Second Appeal preferred by the defendant-respondent was allowed, and the suit for specific performance of contract filed by the appellant was dismissed.
2. On 28.05.1990, the appellant and the respondents entered into an agreement to sell, in which the property in question was to be sold for Rs.23,000/-, and the entire sale consideration was paid before the execution of the Agreement to Sell, and possession of the property in question was also handed over to the appellant. It was also agreed that from the time of execution of the Agreement to Sell, the respondents would have no rights left and it would be the appellant who would have all the rights over the property in question. However, due to the prohibition on registration of the sale deed, it was stipulated that the sale deed would be executed once this restriction was lifted. The Agreement to Sell dated 28.05.1990 contained all the above facts duly incorporated therein. The prohibition on the sale was due to bar contained in Section 5 of the Karnataka Prevention of Fragmentati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.