Vivek Kaisth vs State Of Himachal Pradesh

Breaking News

Back Next

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 1163

C. T. RAVIKUMAR, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Vivek Kaisth – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, AOR Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, Adv. Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Adv. Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv. Mr. Surendranath P. V., Sr. Adv. Mr. Biju P. Raman, AOR Mr. Subhash Chandran K R, Adv. Ms. Krishna L. R., Adv. Mr. John Thomas Arakal, Adv. Mr. Sawan Shukla, Adv. Ms. Lekha Sudhakaran, Adv. Mr. Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gauravjit Singh Patwalia, Adv. Mr. Amit Verma, AOR Ms. Swati Sood, Adv. Mr. Anshuman, AOR Ms. Damini Chawla, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Vishwanathan Iyer, Adv. Ms. Shimpy Sharma, Adv. Mr. Arman Sharma, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mehra, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Jindal, AOR Mr. D. K. Thakur, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Tavleen Singh, Adv. Mr. Divyansh Thakur, Adv. Ms. Vallabhi Shukla, Adv. Mr. Joginder Mann, Adv. Ms. Niharika Singh, Adv. Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Chitranshul A. Sinha, AOR Mr. Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gauravjit Singh Patwalia, Adv. Mr. Amit Verma, AOR Ms. Swati Sood, Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, AOR Mr. Tushar Bakshi, AOR Ms. Neelam Singh, AOR Mr. Mr. Vivek Mishra, Adv., Adv. Mr. Mr. Surinder Singh Lohchab, Adv. Mr. Sameer Singh, Adv. Mr. Kashmira Singh Chahar, Adv. Mr. Christopher Dsouza, AOR Mr. P. V. Surendranath, Sr. Adv. Mr. Biju P. Raman, AOR Mr. Subhash Chandran K R, Adv. Ms. Krishna L. R., Adv. Mr. John Thomas Arakal, Adv. Mr. Sawan Shukla, Adv. Ms. Lekha Sudhakaran, Adv.

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)

1. The appellants before this Court have challenged the Judgment dated 20.09.2021 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh (in Civil Appeal Nos.6233-6234 of 2023, Vivek Kaisth and Akansha Dogra respectively), by which the appointment of the appellants to the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) has been quashed. There are presently four appeals before us. The other three appeals are of the appellants (in connected appeals), who were also candidates for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) for the year 2013 in the State of Himachal Pradesh, and have also challenged the selection process as well as the appointment of the present appellants, though for different reasons. We propose to dispose of these appeals by a common order. All the same, when we refer to the facts in the present case, our reference would be confined to the facts as contained in Civil Appeal No.6233 of 2023 and Civil Appeal No.6234 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

Breaking News

2023 Supreme(SC) 1163

C. T. RAVIKUMAR, SUDHANSHU DHULIAVivek Kaisth – AppellantVersusState Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent

Related Judgments

Vivek Kaisth VS State Of Himachal Pradesh - 2024 1 Supreme 664

Ivana Hossaini vs State of West Bengal - 2025 Supreme(Cal) 924

Shalu Varghese S/o M. M. Varghese VS State of Kerala - 2023 Supreme(Ker) 933

Jaseena C. K. , W/o. Kamarudheen VS State of Kerala, rep. by its Secretary, General Education Department - 2023 Supreme(Ker) 466

Lucknow Nagar Nigam Thru. Nagar Ayukt VS State Public Service Tribunal Thru. Chairman - 2024 Supreme(All) 338

GANPAT UTTAM GURAV AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRIN. SECRETARY LAW AND JUDICIARY DEPT. AND ORS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 11065

Bindu B. Kumar VS Guruvayur Devaswom - 2024 Supreme(Ker) 900

State Of Rajasthan through the Deputy Secretary Admn. , Government Secretariat, Jaipur VS Krishan Joshi S/o Shri Kailash Chandra Joshi - 2022 Supreme(Raj) 821

Priyanka Rani vs State of Jharkhand - 2024 Supreme(Jhk) 1027

State Of Rajasthan VS Namonarayan Sharma - 2026 Supreme(SC) 194

C. T. RAVIKUMAR, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Vivek Kaisth – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent