SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1245

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, CJI., J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA, JJ.
Public Interest Committee for Scheduling Specific Areas and Anr – Appellants
Versus
Union of India & Ors - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No 443 of 2017, Writ Petition (Civil) No 187 of 2019
Decided on : 23-11-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Adv. Ms. Neha Rathi, Adv. Ms. Pritika Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishesh Sharma, Adv. Ms. Mithu Jain, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Amit Sharma, AOR Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Barua, Adv. Ms. Aparna Singh, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Panda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, AOR Mr. Shashwat Panda, Adv. Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, AOR Mr. Basava Prabhu Patil, Ag Sikkim, Sr. Adv. Mr. Basava Prabhu S Patil, Ag Sikkim, Sr. Adv. Mr. Samarth Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Devvrat Singh, Adv. Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Adv. Mr. B K Satija, Adv. Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR

The Delimitation Commission's orders cannot be amended post-publication, and the Election Commission lacks authority to incorporate changes without enabling legislation.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 330, 332, 342, 371F, Representation of Peoples Act, 1950 - Delimitation Act, 2002 - Proportional representation for Scheduled Tribes - Petitioners sought directions for reservation of seats for Limboo-Tamang tribes in legislative assemblies based on the 2006 Delimitation Notification and 2008 Order, arguing that these orders violated constitutional mandates. The court held that the Delimitation Commission's orders are protected by Article 329 and cannot be amended post-publication. The Election Commission's powers under the RP Act do not permit changes without enabling legislation. (Paras 1, 2, 19, 50, 56, 105)

(B) Jurisdiction - Judicial review of electoral matters - The court clarified that it cannot direct Parliament to legislate in a particular manner regarding reservations, maintaining the separation of powers. (Paras 100, 106)

JUDGMENT :

Contents

Constitutional Framework

Representation of Peoples Act, 1950

Delimitation Act, 2002

Factual Context

Submissions on behalf of the Petitioners

Submissions on behalf of the Respondents

Delimitation Notification of 2006 and the Delimitation Order of 2008

Issues

Analysis:

Whether Delimitation Commission can amend the 2006 Notification under the Delimitation Act

Whether the Election Commission can Amend the 2008 Order to incorporate those changes

The Scope of powers of the Election Commission under Article 324, Constitution of India

Representation of Peoples Act, 1950

Scope of Powers of the Election Commission under RP Act.

Section 9, RP Act and Section 11, Delimitation Act

Proportional Representation

Conclusion

1. The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution has been invoked in two petitions. The first of those petitions seeks a direction for the grant of proportional representation for the Scheduled Tribes in the House of the People and in the Legislative Assemblies of West Bengal and Sikkim in terms of the mandate of Articles 330 and 332 of the Constitution.

2. The second petition seeks more specifically, a direction for upholding the constitutional rights of the Limboo-Tamang Scheduled Tribe to reservation of seats in the Sikkim Legislative Assembly. It seeks directions to amend/strike down the Notification of the Delimitation Commission dated 4 September 2006 and the Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order 20081[“2006 Notification” and “2008 Order”] to the extent that they do not provide for reservations for members of the Limboo-Tamang Scheduled Tribe. It additionally seeks directions to the effect that Section 7(1A) of the Representation of People’s Act2[“RP Act”] is ultra vires the Constitution for the same reason. The petitioner seeks directions to the Delimitation Commission as well as the Election Commission to effectuate the mandate of Article 332 of the Constitution, in respect of Limboo Tamang Scheduled Tribe, by undertaking necessary changes to the 2006 Notification and the 2008 Order.

Constitutional Framework

3. Article 342 of the Constitution empowers the President to specify the tribal communities of the country which will be designated as Scheduled Tribes. Communities so designated by the President in the Scheduled Tribes Order or later added by amendment are treated as Scheduled Tribes for the purpose of the Constitution, according to Article 366 (25).

4. Article 330 of the Constitution provides for reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the House of the People. Clause (2) of Article 330 states that the number of seats reserved in a State or Union Territory for the Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes under clause (1) “shall bear, as nearly as may be, the same proportion to the total number of seats allotted to that State or Union Territory in the House of People as the population of Scheduled Castes or Schedule Tribes in that State or Union Territory bears to the total population of the State or Union Territory”.

5. Similar provisions are contained in clause (3) of Article 3323[332. Reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Legislative Assemblies of the States.—(1) Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, 8[except the Scheduled Tribes in the autonomous districts of Assam], in the Legislative Assembly of every State.

(3) The number of seats reserved for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes in the Legislative Assembly of any State under clause (1) shall bear, as nearly as may be, the same proportion to the total number of seats in the Assembly as the population of the Scheduled Castes in the State or of the Scheduled Tribes in the State or part of

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top