SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 401

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Raj Mohan Singh, Harpreet Singh Brar, JJ.
Rajesh Kumar Sharma & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP No.7548 of 2023 (O&M), CWP No.17204 of 2023 (O&M), CWP No.15263 of 2023 (O&M) and CWP No.16079 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 17-10-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. N.K. Verma, Advocate and Mr. Ankush Verma, Advocate for the appellant in CWP No.7548 of 2023.; Mr. G.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the appellant in CWP No.17204 of 2023. Mr. H.P.S. Ishar, Advocate, Mr. Parminder S. Vig, Advocate and Mr. Amrit Pal Singh Sodhi, Advocate, for the appellant in CWP No.15263 of 2023, Mr. Gourave Bhaiyya Gilhotra, Advocate, Mr. Akash Manocha, Advocate and Mr. Hitesh Verma, Advocate for the appellant in CWP No.16079 of 2023, Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. D.V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arshdeep, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 5 in CWP No.7548 of 2023., for respondents No.3 to 6 in CWP No.17204 of 2023. for respondents No.1 to 4 in CWP No.15263 of 2023., for respondents No.1 to 6 in CWP No.16079 of 2023., Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2 in CWP No.17204 of 2023.

Delimitation exercises must adhere strictly to statutory provisions to ensure free and fair elections; failing to do so constitutes a colorable exercise of power.

Headnote:(A) Municipal Act, 1911 - DELIMITATION OF WARDS OF MUNICIPALITIES RULES, 1972 - Constitution of Delimitation Board, Process of delimitation - Authorities failed to follow prescribed procedures in delimitation exercises, which were conducted without alteration of municipal limits or increase in population, thus deemed illegal. The delimitation exercise resulted in the same wards with no new voters added, constituting a colorable exercise of power. (Paras 15, 22, and 28)

(B) Judicial Review - Maintainability of Writ Petitions - Court asserted jurisdiction to intervene when executive actions violate legal norms or infringe upon electoral fairness, especially when prior delimitation processes were not annulled or superseded. (Paras 6, 10, and 24)

Facts of the case:
Four writ petitions were filed against recent delimitation notifications in Punjab, alleging that they were executed without proper procedure and thus detrimental to fair elections. The petitioners contended the previous delimitation was already completed without noting any population change or municipal boundary adjustment. (Paras 2, 15, and 22)

Findings of Court:
Court found that the delimitation process wholly ignored essential statutory provisions, effectively undermining the electoral framework meant to ensure fairness and representation in local governance. Various procedural breaches were identified, making the entire delimitation exercise invalid. (Paras 18, 26, and 28)

Issues: Whether the delimitation process followed legal requirements; whether the actions taken during the delimitation were legitimate and lawful; whether the judicial intervention was warranted. (Paras 6 and 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court determined that adherence to the legislative framework governing delimitation is essential for upholding electoral integrity. Non-compliance rendered the delimitation exercise invalid. The judicial authority was invoked to restore compliance with democratic principles, holding that electoral processes must be free from arbitrary administrative power. (Paras 10, 18, and 26)

Result: Delimitation exercises declared illegal; respondents directed to revert to previous delimitation for upcoming elections. (Paras 28.1 and 28.2)

Table of Content
1. delimitation petitions raised issues of illegality. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented against the delimitation process. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's observations on maintained procedures. (Para 5 , 6)
4. determinations of illegality in delimitation and compliance issues. (Para 15 , 16)
5. final conclusion on the voiding of delimitation processes. (Para 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT

Harpreet Singh Brar, J. - By this common order, four writ petitions, details of which have been given in the head note, are being disposed of, as the issue involved in all the writ petitions is identical. However, facts are being enumerated from CWP No.7548 of 2023 with the consent of all the parties.

1.1. Prayers as culled out from the prayer clause of all writ petitions are as under:-

    CWP No.7548 of 2023

    (i) To set aside the process of wardbandi of the wards of Municipal Council-Dera Baba Nanak, District Gurdaspur and draft notification issued in this regard vide notice dated 22.12.2022 (Annexure P-5) as the said process was done without following the due procedure as prescribed under the Municipal Act, 1911 (hereinafter referred to as the Municipal Act) and the DELIMITATION OF WARDS OF MUNICIPALITIES RULES , 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 1972).

    (ii) To direct respondents to withdraw the publication dated 22.12.2022 (Annexure P-5) whereby objections qua fresh delimitation have been sought and to conduct elections as per the figures of delimitation exercise carried out in the year 2021.

    (iii) To restrain the respondents from finalizing the delimitation exercise and conducting elections during the pendency of the present writ petition.

    CWP No.17204 of 2023

    (i) To quash notification dated 25.05.2022 (Annexure P-5) issued by respondent No.3 vide which Delimitation Board has been constituted for the purpose of delimitation of wards of Municipal Council, Dharamkot, District Moga, being issued in violation of Rule 3 of the Rules of 1972 and order dated 28.07.2020 (Annexure P-2) issued by respondent No.2 as well as the notification dated 18.08.2020 (Annexure P-3) issued under Rule 8 (iv) of the Census Rules, 1990 by respondent No.3 whereby administrative boundaries of all the wards in the State of Punjab have been frozen w.e.f. 31.12.2020 till the completion of census as per the provisions of the Census Act, 1948.

    (ii) To quash draft Scheme dated 22.12.2022 and public notice dated 23.12.2022 (Annexure P-6) issued by respondents No.3 & 5 respectively on the ground that the process of delimitation as undertaken by respondent No.6 in pursuance of notification dated 25.05.2022 (Annexure P-5) is in violation of provisions of Rules 3, 4, 6 and 8 of the Rules of 1972 and notification dated 18.08.2020 (Annexure P-3) issued under Rule 8

    (iii) of the Census Rules, 1990, which places an embargo on changing the administrative boundaries from 31.12.2020 till the completion of census.

    (iv) To quash notification dated 18.01.2023 (Annexure P-12) whereby Rules/Scheme has been prepared by respondent No.3 for dividing Nagar Council, Dharamkot, District Moga in wards and each ward for fixing of number of members to be elected from each ward as well as notifications dated 19.01.2023 (Annexure P-13) and 18.01.2023 (Annexure P-14).

    (v) To direct respondents to maintain administrative boundaries of all the wards of respondent No.5-Municipal Council as stood prior to the notification dated 25.05.2022 (Annexure P-5) and comply with the notification dated 18.08.2020 (Annexure P-3) issued under Rule 8 (iv) of the Census Rules, 1990.

    (vi) To stay the operation of the impugned notifications dated 25.05.2022 (Annexure P-5), 18.01.2023 (Annexure P-12), 19.01.2023 (Annexure P-13) and 18.01.2023 (Annexure P-14) and further restrain the respondents from taking any action qua delimitation and re-adjustment of wards of respondent No.5- Municipal Council.

    CWP No.15263 of 2023

    (i) To quash the illegal appointment of respondents No.5 and 6 as members of the Delimitation Board for Jalandhar M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top